My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2007/08/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
Agenda Packets - 2007/08/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:33 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 3:15:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/13/2007
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/13/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item No: 7B <br />Meeting Date: August 13, 2007 <br />Type of Business: PH & CB <br />Administrator Review : ____ <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: Jim Ericson, Community Development Director <br />Item Title/Subject: Consideration of a Major Subdivision of 8184 Eastwood <br />Road; Planning Case MA2007-002 <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />Abiding Savior Lutheran Church (the “Church”) is the owner of 8184 Eastwood Road, a <br />50,965 square foot residential parcel improved with a one-story home and attached single- <br />stall garage. The parcel is adjacent to the Church’s 6.31 acre tract of land addressed at 8211 <br />Red Oak Drive. The Church has submitted a major subdivision application to split the home <br />and 16,025 square feet of the Eastwood Road parcel, attaching the remaining 34,940 square <br />feet to the larger Church property located at 8211 Red Oak Drive. As a result of the proposed <br />subdivision, the total acreage of the Red Oak Drive parcel would increase from 6.31 acres to <br />7.12 acres. <br /> <br />The Church has previously expressed a desire to develop a senior residential facility on the <br />property, however the requested subdivision does nothing to further this goal. (A subsequent <br />major subdivision would be required, among other planning actions, to proceed with such a <br />development.) The Church intends to sell the home on Eastwood Road upon approval of the <br />requested subdivision. The Church has submitted a preliminary plat and final plat which <br />illustrates the proposed subdivision of 8184 Eastwood Road and has submitted the necessary <br />title commitment which has been forwarded to the City Attorney for review. <br /> <br />Previously: <br /> <br />In December of last year, the Church requested approval of a minor subdivision of the <br />property located at 8184 Eastwood Road. The City Council ultimately denied the request <br />finding that the proposal could not be considered a minor subdivision due to the acreage <br />involved. The Council’s resolution of denial was approved on February 12, 2007. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />A major subdivision is a division of land involving more than two acres of land area or one that <br />creates more than two lots. In this case, the affected area totals approximately 7.49 acres <br />and involves two parcels—8211 Red Oak Drive and 8184 Eastwood Road. Major <br />subdivisions are accomplished by a plat, usually a two-step process by which a preliminary <br />plat is considered followed afterward by a final plat. Major subdivisions require a public <br />hearing. Both parcels are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. The Comprehensive Plan <br />designates the Eastwood Road parcel as Single-Family Detached while the Red Oak Drive <br />parcel is designated Institutional, in recognition of the existing Church facility. The land <br />added to the Red Oak Drive parcel would not be able to be built upon by the Church except <br />through approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.