Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 13, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 17 <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that he would like to know when a list of tentative 1 <br />recommendations would be available. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated he would have Staff provide a brief summary. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Brian Amundsen of 3048 Wooddale Drive addressed Council, and said that he had to drive over 6 <br />to the meeting because the feasibility report cost $200,000 for four miles of road. Mr. Amundsen 7 <br />said that some rain gardens were included last year, and he does not understand why the City 8 <br />would have a feasibility report and pay for that, when it was not ready to be built. Mr. 9 <br />Aamundson said that he wants the project done, but it frustrates him that the Council is being 10 <br />asked to pay for a preliminary feasibility before costs are known. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Mr. Amundsen said that he has serious concerns about the consultant being used. Mr. Amundson 13 <br />asked the Council to not approve any more work from this consultant until there is a better idea 14 <br />what work will be done, and what that work would cost. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Mayor Marty said that the concern he has, is that if Council does not move on this tonight, it may 17 <br />mean going another year without a street project. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Council Member Flaherty asked how much consultant time would be used between this meeting 20 <br />and the next. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that Staff could ask the consultants not to expend any time 23 <br />other than what is required for sending out the resident notices. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Public Works Director Lee explained that the City is required to do a feasibility report, and it 26 <br />usually costs around 15% of the total project costs. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Council Member Flaherty commented that the City Charter and State Statute say that the 29 <br />feasibility study is required. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Council Member Mueller said that she thinks it would be better to hold off on the Feasibility 32 <br />Study until Council knows that residents will support the project. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that would mean that there would not be a project until 35 <br />2009. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Public Works Director Lee explained that there have been other consultants in the past and, the 38 <br />reason that this consultant has this type of feasibility report with these costs, is because the 39 <br />Council and the residents require it. 40 <br /> 41 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 1(Mueller) Motion carried. 42 <br /> 43 <br /> M. Resolution 7141, Approving a Contract with DNR Construction 44 <br /> Services Incorporated for Door Replacement at Treatment Plant No. 1 45