Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council September 24, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br />Attorney Riggs indicated that he has had discussions with Mr. Beer on this matter, but he has not 1 <br />researched and provided an official opinion for Council with regard to the requirements of the 2 <br />Charter. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Valerie Amundsen said that the Charter is to protect the citizens and they respect that. However, 5 <br />Staff was directed to look into the legalities, and they understood that there were no legal issues 6 <br />with it. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Richard Sonterre of 5060 Red Oak Drive said that he has been a big proponent of not repeating 9 <br />the points already stated, but would like to say that he is disappointed that this is now an issue, 10 <br />because the Task Force was led to believe that all legalities regarding the proposed financing 11 <br />package had been reviewed and there were no issues. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Mr. Sonterre said that the Task Force would like to get at least something done in 2008 because 14 <br />it is time to do so. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Mayor Marty said that the reason the 2008 project was picked, was due to the small size and the 17 <br />achievability of it. It is the smallest project in the program. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Sandy Dewing said that the Finance Committee discussed more than one option, but did discuss 20 <br />this option as the preferred one. Ms. Dewing said that this was the Task Force recommendation 21 <br />and they did not recommend going to referendum, and she would like all language for a 22 <br />referendum removed from the document, as the document is a recommendation from the Task 23 <br />Force. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that looking at the schedule for the 2008 project is a 26 <br />concern because the process needed to be started in August of 2007. It is possible to do so, but 27 <br />the timeframe is tight, so his recommendation would be to wait. He then said that, as it is set up, 28 <br />construction would not be able to start until late July, and that is unfavorable timing for the 29 <br />project and that concerns Staff. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Council Member Mueller corrected the program length from 18 to 10 years, at the bottom of 32 <br />Page 8, remove the last sentence, and remove the tax levy referendum from the document as that 33 <br />is not the Task Force recommendation. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Council Member Flaherty said that it is his understanding that this document was supposed to be 36 <br />simple and should be revised to be so. On Page 2, the language on trailways should come out; 37 <br />Page 3, PCI remove the additional verbiage on pavement rating; Page 7, pedestrian bicycle 38 <br />accommodations should be removed as it does not seem necessary with this document; mail box 39 <br />groupings he took out everything other than the U.S. Post Office has final approval; Page 8, 40 <br />remove extra language on the cost of McDonald’s, etc.; Remove language regarding the 41 <br />referendum. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Council Member Flaherty indicated that the point was to be brief, so as not to confuse the points. 44 <br />More information is available if someone would like to have it. 45