My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/01/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/01/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:45:51 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 4:43:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/9/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
1/9/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council December 5, 2005 <br />Truth in Taxation Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated they do look at trend data, for example how much it costs to 1 <br />plow streets, whether it is increasing or decreasing, and how to be more efficient. He advised 2 <br />that the Council scrutinized each line item and challenged staff as to whether the activity had to 3 <br />be undertaken or the item purchased. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Mayor Marty commended the Council for questioning a number of things, and line items, as the 6 <br />budget has been reviewed. He noted that in the past he had suggestions or questioned things but 7 <br />then it just moved on. However, with this Council it did not just move on and the item was 8 <br />discussed as to merits. He stated there was good consensus and scrutiny on the budget being 9 <br />considered tonight. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Finance Director Beer concurred, noting the Council even considered amounts as small as $200. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Mr. Glidden asked what determines the amount or percentage of increase in new budget, noting 14 <br />budgets hardly ever go down. Councilmember Gunn stated the LGA cuts of $900,000 over the 15 <br />last three years. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Mayor Marty concurred, noting that equaled 19% of the City’s budget. Now the City is receiving 18 <br />no State assistance. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated Mr. Glidden is asking what raises budget items. She noted that 21 <br />the loss of LGA is a revenue decrease and has nothing to do with an increase of a general fund 22 <br />budget item for expenses. She explained that if an item is needed by a Department, that is where 23 <br />an increase comes from. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Mr. Glidden asked if those items are also scrutinized. Councilmember Thomas stated they are 26 <br />scrutinized item by item and in recent years have involved mostly personnel costs and insurance. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Finance Director Beer stated 55% of the budget is personnel and 23% is contractural services so 29 <br />inflation drives the increases there considerably. He noted there was a 7.5% increase in health 30 <br />insurance this year and the salary increases were at about the same rate of inflation. He 31 <br />explained that for three-fourths of the budget, the union contract and contractural services dictate 32 <br />what their increases are, noting fire service went up 5.25% this year. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated people get pay raises, the Council had to look at the considerable 35 <br />increase in gas prices, and they also looked at capital expenditures and whether a vehicle is 36 <br />needed. That is what causes a budget to increase, noting the Council does not have much control 37 <br />over wages and insurance premium increases. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Mr. Glidden asked who balances the cost projections, the required budget amount, against what 40 <br />the tax revenue is going to be. Councilmember Thomas stated the Council does that activity. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Finance Director Beer explained that the Council started with 8% as the proposed amount of 43 <br />property tax increase. Councilmember Thomas stated that is correct and the Council adjusted it 44 <br />to zero. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.