Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council December 5, 2005 <br />Truth in Taxation Meeting Page 9 <br /> <br />Mr. Glidden stated at a previous meeting there was a nice presentation of major budget items that 1 <br />showed projected increases and decreases item by item. He stated the Council talked about items 2 <br />on the list that showed major increases but he does not have that list tonight. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Mayor Marty invited Mr. Glidden to attend the work session tomorrow night to address those 5 <br />budgeted items. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Mr. Glidden stated he understands the big tax increase he received is not coming from the City 8 <br />but he wants to emphasize the need to compare the projected increases in costs against what 9 <br />residents can afford to pay. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Mayor Marty stated one of the reasons the levy could be kept down is because there were no 12 <br />street projects. However, there will probably be projects in 2007 so there will be bonding to 13 <br />repair streets and do infrastructure work. That may mean an increase in 2007. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Mr. Glidden stated he recalls that discussion from a previous year and is upset that the City 16 <br />skipped street maintenance for a year since it will take on additional risk. Finance Director Beer 17 <br />corrected that the City did street maintenance but did not undertake a street reconstruction 18 <br />project. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated street reconstruction is significantly behind schedule and is an 21 <br />issue the Council deals with on the petition basis. She stated she is not sure it is something that 22 <br />can be done for next year but the Council will have to work with the Public Works Department 23 <br />on that issue. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Mr. Glidden questioned the difference between a street maintenance and a street reconstruction 26 <br />cost. He asked if it is just the difference in the timescale and budget to do it. Councilmember 27 <br />Flaherty explained that street maintenance is filling a pothole in the street or sweeping of the 28 <br />street. Street reconstruction was proposed last year and involves tearing out the street, redoing 29 <br />the sewer lines, and reconstructing the streets. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Mr. Glidden stated you have to expect that for any street in the City, you will need funds to 32 <br />rebuild it. He stated he would expect there is an amount built into the budget that covers 33 <br />reconstruction of the street as well as filling the pothole. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Councilmember Gunn stated that would involve adding millions of dollars to the budget. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Councilmember Thomas explained that is talking about the debt service, which cannot be put 38 <br />into the budget when the debt has not yet occurred. She stated the Council has been talking 39 <br />about a 10-year project for street reconstruction. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Mayor Marty again invited Mr. Glidden to attend the work session tomorrow night. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Brian Amundson, 3048 Wooddale Drive, stated he wanted to clarify some of the things that were 44 <br />said tonight. He asked if the numbers on his property tax statement reflected the old levy 45