My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/01/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/01/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:45:51 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 4:43:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/9/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
1/9/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council December 12, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that last year the Council authorized SEH 2 <br />to do a wetland delineation survey of the Spring Creek wetland basin. He reviewed the location 3 <br />of the subject wetland and explained this delineation was authorized because the official wetland 4 <br />zoning maps were created in the 1980s but were not based on a delineation. Those maps were 5 <br />based on aerial flights, photography, and elevations. The maps were not field verified and were 6 <br />meant to be a tool to assist the City to regulate the wetland buffer. He explained the way the 7 <br />Code is written, the delineation goes back to the official City maps, which have not been updated 8 <br />as the wetland information has been updated. Director Ericson noted there may be a discrepancy 9 <br />between what the official City maps show and the true official footprint of the wetland. SEH has 10 <br />delineated the true boundary of the wetland and that boundary was pulled in from what is shown 11 <br />on the official City wetland zoning maps. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Director Ericson displayed a map of the Spring Creek wetland basin showing the new wetland 14 <br />delineation and buffer map. He noted this will, in most cases, pull the wetland line farther away 15 <br />from resident’s homes and yards. Director Ericson stated the Council is being asked to adopt a 16 <br />resolution to identify a true delineation of where the wetland is and confirms the location. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Director Ericson explained that a resident may or may not need a wetland buffer permit if they 19 <br />want to remodel their house or redo their driveway. If the project is within the wetland buffer, 20 <br />then an additional $25 permit is needed. However, staff knew that in some cases the wetland 21 <br />was not impacted and the permit was not needed. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Director Ericson stated this action would hold the public hearing, adopt the new wetland 24 <br />delineation, and then the City’s official zoning maps will be updated. This same process will be 25 <br />used for all wetland areas in Mounds View and will give residents a better idea of where 26 <br />wetlands are located. Director Ericson advised that if requested, the City can print out a map of 27 <br />the resident’s property before and after the wetland delineation. In most cases, it will show less 28 <br />of an impact on resident’s properties. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Director Ericson stated there is now better electronic data and the maps are in digital form so it 31 <br />will be easier to manage the wetland, print maps, and make amendments when necessary. He 32 <br />stated this is the first time the City has taken formal action to approve a new wetland delineation 33 <br />and offered to answer questions of the residents. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Mayor Marty asked staff to display the pre-delineation zoning map and the new wetland zoning 36 <br />map. He noted that the old map shows the wetland impacted just about every property and that 37 <br />their homes were either within the wetland or buffer zone. This action will identify the actual 38 <br />location of the wetland. Mayor Marty noted that since the 1980s, the wetland areas may have 39 <br />receded somewhat and this could be a classic case of that happening. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Mayor Marty asked residents if they would like to speak to this issue. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Gene Anderson, 2948 Wooddale Drive, stated that in April of this year the City Engineer spent 44 <br />considerable money doing surveys and looking at the wetland in terms of developing a holding 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.