My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/02/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/02/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:28 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 4:53:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/13/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/13/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
381
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council January 23, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br />stated that it is not something he can do but if the Council wants to delay awarding that contract, 1 <br />the Council has the power and ability to do so. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated that she agreed with the majority that the main point of the 4 <br />citation is to get the action taken care of. She stated that if Mr. Bteibet can present everything he 5 <br />was cited for and explain how it was taken care of and dealt with, at that point, consideration 6 <br />could be given about dropping any other action. She stressed that everything the citation noted 7 <br />would have to be completed. She stated that if the citations were significantly unaddressed, there 8 <br />would be something else to discuss. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated that she does not know how long the Council should be willing to 11 <br />wait on the canopy as the timeframe is unknown for finding investors, but she does know the 12 <br />new business next door is affected because of the canopy is a blight issue for that business. She 13 <br />stated that the time frame needs to be limited due to safety considerations and cannot be delayed 14 <br />for more than a couple of weeks. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Mr. Bteibet stressed he was not cited for the issues with the canopy and car wash, and stated that 17 <br />he does not want to walk away from this issue, even if investors can be found to fix the gas 18 <br />station and get it going. Mr. Bteibet stated that nothing would be in it for himself. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated it will need to be shown to the City that all of the items that Mr. 21 <br />Bteibet was specifically cited have been resolved. Mr. Bteibet stated that to his knowledge, the 22 <br />three items he was cited for have been taken care of, and apologized for the delay in the remedy 23 <br />of these citations. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Mayor Marty inquired if the fire code violations have been included. Director Ericson stated that 26 <br />it was his understanding that they have been corrected. He stated that the partially dismantled 27 <br />roof has been completely dismantled and removed. He stated that the two signs that were erected 28 <br />without permits have been removed and are no longer an issue. He also noted that by removing 29 <br />the partially demolished roof treatment, this has helped to address the issue of the blight of the 30 <br />building. He stated that Mr. Bteibet has addressed those violations. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Mayor Marty stated that having the canopy sitting in the parking lot blocks the new business that 33 <br />is next door. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Mr. Bteibet stressed that he has a couple of individuals that approached him to invest in the 36 <br />business. He stated that he was honest with the potential investors that there are issues with the 37 <br />lease and the City. He stated that if the issues are resolved, the investors would be open to 38 <br />paying the costs of fixing the canopy and turning it into a presentable business. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Mayor Marty inquired whether this issue should be discussed at the January 30, 2006 Work 41 <br />Session. City Administrator Ulrich stated that the work session agenda is fairly full. Mayor 42 <br />Marty stated that he would like to look into the issue a little more at a different time. 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.