My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/02/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/02/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:28 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 4:53:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/13/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/13/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
381
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 10, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br /> <br />Development. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Mayor Marty invited public comment. There were no public comments made. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Councilmember Thomas thanked staff for looking into the easement issues on the outlots. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Mayor Marty asked if Ordinance 765 would be changed to state this. Director Ericson responded 9 <br />he was not sure it was appropriate to be in the ordinance, but it would be in the preliminary plat. 10 <br />He requested on Resolution 6630 the last sentence under Resolved 5. be stricken. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Director Ericson requested changing the resolution to require phase 2 and phase 3 come back 13 <br />before the Council. He indicated the intent was to get authorization for the full buildout, but if 14 <br />Council only wanted to approve Phase 1 at this time, that was in their power to do that. 15 <br /> 16 <br />City Attorney Riggs stated the Council had broad discretion in this matter. He indicted the 17 <br />development contract contemplates a phased development and if there were any deviations from 18 <br />that, it would have to come back to Council. He stated he did not believe they were dealing with 19 <br />the same issues. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Director Ericson stated in his staff report he recommended if there were no changes made to the 22 <br />development, Medtronic could move forward with it, but if changes were made, this needed to be 23 <br />reviewed by the City Council. He noted they could add this to the Resolution. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Councilmember Flaherty believed this was a good idea and asked if something could be written 26 <br />in the ordinance addressing this also. Community Development Director Ericson responded they 27 <br />could do that also. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Mayor Marty stated he had a question on Resolution 6630, first page, item 3. He noted 30 <br />subsequent changes would be dealt with by future Councils and he suggested they have 31 <br />something in there that Council has a cursory review. He indicated he wanted to leave that 32 <br />option open. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated she had no problem stating that Council should look at changes, 35 <br />but reminded the Council that they were approving a three phase development and that was the 36 <br />whole point of the plan and cautioned them to not go too far down the road. She stated they had 37 <br />to draw the line at some point and every choice the Council made, a future Council needed to 38 <br />deal with. She stated as long as the plans did not change, Medtronic should not be required to 39 <br />come back to Council. Director Ericson suggested striking under Resolution 6630, item 3 “with 40 <br />the exception of updating the transportation mitigation plan”. He also suggested adding after 41 <br />approved plans “all applicable current codes and regulations.” 42 <br /> 43 <br />Mayor Marty asked if they could create a swale or berm to contain the water on the current hole 9 44 <br />so all water was maintained on their property. Public Works Director Lee responded that could 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.