Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 10, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br /> <br />Development. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Mayor Marty invited public comment. There were no public comments made. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Councilmember Thomas thanked staff for looking into the easement issues on the outlots. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Mayor Marty asked if Ordinance 765 would be changed to state this. Director Ericson responded 9 <br />he was not sure it was appropriate to be in the ordinance, but it would be in the preliminary plat. 10 <br />He requested on Resolution 6630 the last sentence under Resolved 5. be stricken. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Director Ericson requested changing the resolution to require phase 2 and phase 3 come back 13 <br />before the Council. He indicated the intent was to get authorization for the full buildout, but if 14 <br />Council only wanted to approve Phase 1 at this time, that was in their power to do that. 15 <br /> 16 <br />City Attorney Riggs stated the Council had broad discretion in this matter. He indicted the 17 <br />development contract contemplates a phased development and if there were any deviations from 18 <br />that, it would have to come back to Council. He stated he did not believe they were dealing with 19 <br />the same issues. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Director Ericson stated in his staff report he recommended if there were no changes made to the 22 <br />development, Medtronic could move forward with it, but if changes were made, this needed to be 23 <br />reviewed by the City Council. He noted they could add this to the Resolution. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Councilmember Flaherty believed this was a good idea and asked if something could be written 26 <br />in the ordinance addressing this also. Community Development Director Ericson responded they 27 <br />could do that also. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Mayor Marty stated he had a question on Resolution 6630, first page, item 3. He noted 30 <br />subsequent changes would be dealt with by future Councils and he suggested they have 31 <br />something in there that Council has a cursory review. He indicated he wanted to leave that 32 <br />option open. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated she had no problem stating that Council should look at changes, 35 <br />but reminded the Council that they were approving a three phase development and that was the 36 <br />whole point of the plan and cautioned them to not go too far down the road. She stated they had 37 <br />to draw the line at some point and every choice the Council made, a future Council needed to 38 <br />deal with. She stated as long as the plans did not change, Medtronic should not be required to 39 <br />come back to Council. Director Ericson suggested striking under Resolution 6630, item 3 “with 40 <br />the exception of updating the transportation mitigation plan”. He also suggested adding after 41 <br />approved plans “all applicable current codes and regulations.” 42 <br /> 43 <br />Mayor Marty asked if they could create a swale or berm to contain the water on the current hole 9 44 <br />so all water was maintained on their property. Public Works Director Lee responded that could 45