Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 10, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 14 <br /> <br />to execute a cross access, joint parking and maintenance agreement with the owner of the 1 <br />Walgreens site and provide a copy to the City. 2 <br /> 3 <br />He stated there is but one access to the site which is the shared driveway onto Edgewood Drive. 4 <br />While it is possible for clients of the building to exit County Road 10 and access the Belting 5 <br />building indirectly via the Walgreens site, this would be a more circuitous route and would not be 6 <br />encouraged. 7 <br /> 8 <br />He indicated the Walgreens PUD requires that the building shall be constructed of high-quality 9 <br />masonry construction using brick and brick accents to match the Community Center, theater and 10 <br />City Hall. Materials and siding effects shall be consistently applied on all four building 11 <br />elevations. The PUD document does not however explicitly indicate the percentage of the 12 <br />building which needs to be brick or masonry. The Applicant desires to incorporate a mix of 13 <br />exterior finish materials to help accent the building. It should be noted that the Walgreens 14 <br />building is at best 60% brick, the remaining upper 40% being stucco (EIFS). He noted it was not 15 <br />necessary to have full brick on the back side, but staff felt it was important to have a continuing 16 <br />facade on the north, west and south side of the building. 17 <br /> 18 <br />He stated according to Section 15 of the Walgreens PUD document, the Beltin parcel is 19 <br />permitted a maximum 100 square feet of ground monument signage (excluding the sign base) 20 <br />plus an additional 100 square feet of building mounted signage per building occupant. Staff will 21 <br />review all signage permits to ensure consistency with both the PUD as well as Chapter 1008 of 22 <br />the Municipal Code relating to signage. 23 <br /> 24 <br />He indicated the photometric analysis provided for the project has two options, both of which 25 <br />satisfy the City’s minimum requirements concerning glare and light spillage. The second option 26 <br />(option 2) allows slightly more light to spill over the periphery of the Community Center parking 27 <br />lot, which may be a desirable outcome. 28 <br /> 29 <br />He stated an easement originally platted with the Mounds View City Hall addition will need to 30 <br />be vacated as a result of this plan. The easement had been taken assuming a different utilization. 31 <br />A new easement would be taken in its place. The applicant’s engineer has prepared the legal 32 <br />descriptions for the easement to be vacated along with the description of the easement to be 33 <br />acquired. 34 <br /> 35 <br />He noted the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the development review request at 36 <br />their meeting on September 21, 2005, recommending approval. 37 <br /> 38 <br />He stated staff’s recommendation was to approve Resolution 817-05 which recommends 39 <br />approval of a development review for the proposed 8,300 square foot single story office building 40 <br />at 2395 County Road 10. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Dr. Greg Belting, 1525 Sherman Lake Road, Lino Lakes, stated they had missed the all brick 43 <br />requirement for the building materials when they designed the building. He indicated their 44 <br />destination point was a business usage purpose and he stated they could have a nice look to the 45