My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-27-2006 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
02-27-2006 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:38 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 4:57:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/27/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/27/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
332
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Belting Request <br />Feb 27, 2006 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />The Planning Commission and City Council have granted parking concessions in the past, all <br />of which have worked out according to plan without any negative consequences. There are <br />two examples where parking did become an issue—the Carmike Cinema and the <br />Mezzenga/Farrell building; however neither resulted from a variance in required parking <br />stalls. Two recent examples of reduced parking requirements include Zep Manufacturing on <br />Coral Sea Street and the Minnesota Institute of Public Health building on County Road 10. <br />In both cases, the parking requirement was reduced from 1 space per 175 square feet to 1 <br />space per 250 square feet. <br /> <br />Staff has reviewed parking codes from other communities and across the nation (American <br />Planning Association Parking Guidebook) and we have found that Mounds View’s parking <br />requirements tend to require more parking than other communities. In the case of office <br />uses, the average requirement ranges from 4-5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of building <br />space. Given these examples and previous City authorizations, staff feels comfortable <br />supporting a parking ratio of 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (in other <br />words, one space per 200 square feet.) This would result in 42 parking stalls being <br />required, which the site plan would accommodate. <br /> <br />The alternative to considering such an amendment would be to hold firm to the identified <br />parking ratios and require the building to be scaled back to the point where the parking would <br />match with the building square footage. Staff has calculated how much floor area would <br />have to be eliminated to accomplish this, which appears to be no more than 400 square feet, <br />if done in such a way to create additional parking in the process. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission considered the proposed PUD amendment at their meeting on <br />February 15, 2006 and unanimously adopted a resolution which recommends that the PUD <br />be amended to allow for the 43 stalls as provided. Their resolution is attached for the <br />Council’s reference. <br /> <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Dr. Belting requests that the City consider an amendment to the PUD that would establish <br />parking requirements at the rate of one stall per 200 square feet of gross floor area. Staff <br />and the Planning Commission support the proposed amendment and as such a resolution <br />for the Council’s consideration has been prepared. If the Council does not support the <br />recommendation, a motion to deny the resolution would be in order, otherwise a motion to <br />approve Resolution 6734 would be desired. Action may be tabled if additional information is <br />deemed necessary before a decision is made. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />________________________ <br />James Ericson <br />Community Development Director <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.