My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/03/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/03/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:56 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 5:00:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/13/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/13/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council February 27, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />for all parties involved. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Planning Associate Heller explained that easements have been dedicated along the street, and 3 <br />before the final plat approval, easements will need to be dedicated for access to the pond area 4 <br />from the street to maintain the pond. She commented Public Works widened the streets per Staff 5 <br />recommendation to allow for street parking. She explained the street was widened from 24 feet 6 <br />to 34 feet, and the cul-de-sac was widened from 45 to 47 feet. Planning Associate Heller 7 <br />explained that the cul-de-sac is not located as far north. She explained that by moving the street 8 <br />farther south, this will help one of the homes to be located farther from the wetland area. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Planning Associate Heller explained there are park dedication fees required with this project 11 <br />since there are six new homes to be built. She stated the fee is based on 10 percent of the land 12 <br />value. She mentioned utilities already exist on the site which is why the developer has decided to 13 <br />put the street on the western boundary. She commented traffic should not be increased too much 14 <br />because there are only six homes proposed. She explained at an average of 10 vehicle trips per 15 <br />day per home, there would be 60 extra movements on Wooddale Drive. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Planning Associate Heller stated there is not a lot of quality vegetation on the site, and Staff 18 <br />recommends to save as many fir trees as possible. She stated there are no wetlands on the site 19 <br />according to the City, but there is one according to Rice Creek Watershed District. She 20 <br />commented that hopefully it will not have to be filled in. She commented the drainage will run 21 <br />into the wetland for one lot and the rest of lots will run into the pond area which is more of a 22 <br />basin at this point. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Planning Associate Heller explained there were five soil test borings put down on the site, and 25 <br />fill was encountered at the surface of all borings. She stated the quality of the fill brought in has 26 <br />been in question, and some of it will need to be removed and replaced with better quality fill as 27 <br />the development happens. She stated it would help the neighborhood when the site gets leveled 28 <br />off. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Planning Associate Heller stated there were neighborhood discussions prior to the Planning 31 <br />Commission meeting, and commented that the main concern was drainage issues. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Planning Associate Heller stated Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of this 34 <br />Resolution. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Mayor M arty opened the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked if the neighborhood issues have been addressed. Planning 41 <br />Associate Heller commented that the applicant talked to some of the neighbors, and once 42 <br />residents realized that the new homes would not be put on the current fill, and the drainage would 43 <br />be consolidated between the original Hidden Hollow development and this new development, the 44 <br />neighbors felt more comfortable that the problems will be corrected. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.