My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/03/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/03/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:56 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 5:00:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/13/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/13/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council February 27, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> <br />County Road H2. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Director of Public Works Lee stated the estimated cost to put the sidewalk on the east side of the 3 <br />road is $521,000 or $368,000 on the west side of the road. He stated this does not include any 4 <br />easement or land acquisition that may be needed. He stated the funding source is not identified 5 <br />yet, and pointed out there is a possibility of using TIF, but indicated that Staff is looking for 6 <br />direction from the Council. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Director of Public Works Lee explained he received 16 letters after the neighborhood 9 <br />informational meeting, with twelve residents in favor of the project, three residents were opposed 10 <br />to the project, and one resident was dependent on the type of project the City goes forward with. 11 <br />He added that nine residents favor the east side while two residents favor the west side. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Director of Public Works Lee reviewed the tentative schedule of the proposal. He also reviewed 14 <br />the set of issues that Staff is looking for direction on from the Council, which include the 15 <br />sidewalk being on the east side versus the west side for the segment between County Road H and 16 <br />County Road H2, the pathway along the road through the park area that was not studied as part of 17 <br />the feasibility report, the safety and security concerns that may be remedied by adding lighting in 18 <br />the park area, and the sidewalk along the driveway entrance into Silver View Park. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Director of Public Works Lee presented and reviewed an air photo of the park. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Director of Public Works Lee explained the five action steps are to approve the feasibility report, 23 <br />hold a public hearing, order the project, order plans and specifications, and authorize the start of 24 <br />easement document preparation. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Laurie Flygare, 5072 Silver Lake Road, stated that she favors the sidewalk on the east side of 27 <br />Silver Lake Road. She stated she was surprised the time line was expanded and was under the 28 <br />understanding that TIF funds had already been selected for the project, but this does not seem to 29 <br />be accurate. She stated she would like the funding sources to be identified before going forward. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Ms. Flygare stated she is concerned about parking and would like to know where residents are 32 <br />supposed to park. She commented the road behind is quite dark. She asked where the mailboxes 33 <br />will be. She stated she is concerned about the walkway going through the park area, and 34 <br />commented she would walk on the street if she was forced to walk through the park. She added 35 <br />the Council should address the lighting issue. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Ms. Flygare suggested the City work out something with Ramsey County in regard to the 38 <br />parking. She commented there were four homes in a row with new driveways within the last 39 <br />year and a half. She stated she was concerned with having the area tore up. She added there was 40 <br />some satisfaction as the contractor told residents they would take good care to replace the 41 <br />concrete with the same or better grade. She asked if there is something that can be done with 42 <br />Ramsey County to give a lane to park on and take a lane going north if the sidewalk is put on the 43 <br />east side. She commented a resident with multiple vehicles may not have enough room to park. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.