Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council February 27, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 12 <br /> <br />meander around them, but it could be more of an adverse affect for the homeowners. He 1 <br />suggested the City could try and work out a way if a tree has to be taken out by perhaps replacing 2 <br />it with two to three other trees to create a screening area if the property owners wanted. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Councilmember Gunn asked what would happen if the property owner wanted to save their trees 5 <br />and is willing to have the sidewalk go around it. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Director of Public Works Lee replied it is a possibility, but with the slopes in certain areas and 8 <br />the farther away from the road the sidewalk is, there will be more of an impact to the front yards. 9 <br />He commented the City has been successful with past projects, and will work closely with 10 <br />property owners with this project to meet both the needs and expectations of the property owners 11 <br />as well as the needs of the City in the future. 12 <br /> 13 <br />MOTION/SECOND: MARTY/FLAHERTY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6756 14 <br />Approving the Feasibility Report, Ordering the Project, Authorizing Plan and Specifications, 15 <br />Authorizing Easement Preparation Activities for the Silver Lake Road Sidewalk Improvement 16 <br />Project. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 8:11 p.m. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Director of Public Works Lee asked if the Council wants the feasibility report to be amended to 21 <br />look into the feasibility of having the sidewalk on the east side of County Road I. He asked if 22 <br />further direction in terms of the lighting and asked if estimated costs should be included. 23 <br /> 24 <br />The Council stated that it should. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked if the sidewalk would not detour through the park, and whether it 27 <br />will be either a concrete or bituminous surface, if it would be advantageous to look at what a 28 <br />wooden structure would be going through there. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Director of Public Works Lee stated he did not know offhand what the exact dollars are, but it 31 <br />was discussed earlier on when the feasibility report was studied. He explained it was 32 <br />astronomical compared to what is planned now for both construction and maintenance. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated it is also expensive to straighten out the trail, so it would not hurt 35 <br />to calculate the cost of the wooden structure since it would have less impact on the wetlands. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Director of Public Works Lee responded Staff can give a rough approximation. 38 <br /> 39 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 40 <br /> 41 <br />D. Consideration of Resolution 6749 Approving an Expansion of the C.G. Hill 42 <br />& Sons Building at 5150 Quincy Street. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Planning Associate Heller stated this Resolution is for an expansion of the C.G. Hill & Sons 45