Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council February 27, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 20 <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated he plans on being in attendance, and added that Ramsey County 1 <br />is carrying the bill because it in regard to County Road J and will testify for it. 2 <br /> 3 <br /> B. Reports of Staff 4 <br /> 5 <br />1. Reports of City Administrator 6 <br /> 7 <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated Director Ericson provided a memo in regard to the Library Task 8 <br />Force and they did make a recommendation of four possible alternatives. He stated they would 9 <br />be discussed by the Library Task Force at a retreat on March 1, 2006. He stated three out of four 10 <br />of the alternatives are positive for Mounds View, and one is more for a regional type library. 11 <br /> 12 <br />City Administrator read the four alternatives, which included: 1) Consolidate staff and resources 13 <br />from the libraries in Arden Hills and Mounds View to build one larger area library; 2) Maintain 14 <br />two smaller libraries by constructing one in Arden Hills and leaving Mounds View as is; 3) Build 15 <br />a new library on the current Arden Hills site, maintain the current Mounds View library, and 16 <br />expand the Shoreview library to meet future growth; and 4) Build a new library on the current 17 <br />Arden Hills site, build a new library on the Arden Hills site and build a new library in Silver 18 <br />Lake Village in St. Anthony. City Administrator Ulrich reported that these four alternatives will 19 <br />be discussed at the library board on March 1, 2006. 20 <br /> 21 <br />City Administrator suggested the Council should pass a motion supporting one of these four 22 <br />alternates, if it felt strongly about one of them. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Councilmember Thomas suggested a letter of support could be drafted to indicate support of the 25 <br />Mounds View Community Library. 26 <br /> 27 <br />MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/MARTY. To draft a letter of support for the Mounds View 28 <br />Community Library. 29 <br /> 30 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 31 <br /> 32 <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated there was a position paper on eminent domain put out by North 33 <br />Metro Mayors which the Council could provide comments on. He stated it is consistent with 34 <br />how the legislator spoke last week in regard to eminent domain. He stated the North Metro 35 <br />Mayors position is one to urge that wise decisions are made and listen to what the needs of the 36 <br />communities are that may need to use eminent domain and what the positive aspects are. He 37 <br />stated the legislators commented that they would certainly take that into account and this 38 <br />reiterates that fact that there are valid reasons for using eminent domain. He stated private 39 <br />property rights are important, but attention should also be given to what the City needs eminent 40 <br />domain for and there are valid reasons for pursuing that in certain cases. 41 <br /> 42 <br />City Administrator Ulrich presented the report on the Bethlehem Baptist Church Mounds View 43 <br />Service Project Fund, where $13,005 is proposed to be distributed. He reported that Bethlehem 44 <br />Baptist Church has been working with Staff as well as the Park and Recreation Commission to 45