My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/03/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/03/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:07 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 5:27:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/27/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/27/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Mayor Marty stated he was just worried if the charges came in high, it would impact the amount 2 <br />of money that was going to the Streets Fund. Director of Public Works Lee stated it is separate 3 <br />and charges are established annually by the City Council as part of the fee structure. 4 <br /> 5 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 6 <br /> 7 <br />F. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 769, an ordinance Amending 8 <br />and Revising Chapter 1008 of the Municipal Code Relating to Signs and 9 <br />Billboards. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that the Municipal Code relating to signs 12 <br />and billboards needs to be amended to bring the City Code into compliance with the agreement 13 <br />of the City and Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. relating to the relocation of billboards from the golf 14 <br />course property to elsewhere in the community. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Director Ericson noted the City Attorney was asked to look at some of the issues relating to the 17 <br />First Amendment relating to free speech, as there were a few court cases relating to sign codes in 18 <br />the metropolitan area that resulted in some proposed changes from the City’s attorney office. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Director Ericson reviewed the proposed amendments to the Sign Code. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Director Ericson explained that Clear Channel has requested that the ordinance be drafted to 23 <br />remove the interim use permit revisions relating to billboards. Director Ericson noted that a 24 <br />representative from a Clear Channel Outdoor is present for questions. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Director Ericson stated Staff recommends adoption of the introduction and first reading of 27 <br />Ordinance 769. He noted the second reading is scheduled for March 27, 2006. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Director Ericson stated proposed signs could be located anywhere on Interstate 35W, anywhere 30 <br />on Highway 10, Old Highway 8 (South of County Road H), County Road 10 (South of 31 <br />Wooddale), County Road 10 (North of Silver Lake Road). He noted it also has to be consistent 32 <br />with B2, B3, and I1 PUD zoning; in effect, there are little pockets where signs could be located if 33 <br />it meets other setbacks from residential areas and other requirements of the Sign Code. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Director Ericson states the changes make the Code consistent with the agreement that the City 36 <br />executed with Clear Channel and addresses free speech issues, and the changes also make the 37 <br />Sign Code more defensible to withstand any challenges. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Director Ericson offered to answer questions. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked for confirmation that of the six original signs, two are maintained 42 <br />on the Medtronic property, one is on the SYSCO Lot A, and three need to be relocated. Director 43 <br />Ericson stated this is correct. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.