Agenda Packets - 2006/03/27 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council March 13, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 24 the additional proposal can be analyzed to see if money can be saved. 1 2 Councilmember Thomas stated she agrees that the item should be postponed. She commented 3 that the other proposal came in from the firm that did the North St. Paul project, which is very 4 similar to this one. She stated she would like to obtain more information from them including 5 what the 6 percent of the Phase 2 ideas is, what items would fall under that and to get a total on 6 that. 7 8 MOTION: STIGNEY/. To postpone indefinitely Resolution 6776 Approving Execution of a 9 Supplemental Letter of Agreement with Short, Elliot, Hendrickson, Inc. for Community Center 10 Remodeling. 11 12 Councilmember Thomas asked why a motion needs to be made to postpone the item. 13 14 Motion died for lack of a second. 15 16 No action was taken on the resolution at this time. 17 18 City Administrator Ulrich stated the item will be discussed at the next regular Council meeting. 19 20 S. Resolution 6777 Approving Contract Amendment with Canyon Catering, 21 LLC. 22 23 City Administrator Ulrich noted the proposal is for an interim temporary lease with Canyon 24 Catering for $2,000 per month under a 30 day automatically renewing lease, which would allow 25 them to continue operation of the banquet center catering on the interim basis until the City 26 makes a final determination on the direction of the Community Center, based on the 27 recommendation of the Mounds View Community Center Task Force. 28 29 City Administrator Ulrich noted he has not heard back from Canyon Catering, and noted that the 30 Resolution could be unilaterally approved at this time if the Council agrees with the terms and 31 conditions. He stated if the terms and conditions are revised by the Council, it could be reviewed 32 with Canyon Catering. He stated Staff recommends the terms and conditions. 33 34 Councilmember Thomas asked how it reflects the fact that the City will still be occupying the 35 space for the month of April. She asked if there should be a waiver for rent while the City still 36 occupies the space. 37 38 City Administrator Ulrich explained in the original agreement, the lease is waived during the 39 period of time the City occupied the building. He stated the City is occupying the building for 40 another month due to construction delays. He stated the question is if the City should waive the 41 lease payment for the month of April. 42 43 Councilmember Thomas stated there is still no agreement for the month of April, and suggested 44 something still needs to be put into place that would cover April. She stated putting the interim 45