My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1991/11/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
Agenda Packets - 1991/11/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:14 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 6:05:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/25/1991
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/25/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ounds View City Council Page Eleven <br /> Regular Meeting November 25, 1991 <br /> Mr. Stigney responded that he did know because of his involvement <br /> with carrying around a petition regarding the Clerk-Administrator's <br /> salary. <br /> Mr. Stigney stated that his own personal feelings were that there are <br /> City employees that could use more money. Stigney further stated <br /> the Clerk-Administrator could use less money. Stigney stated the <br /> equity of pay is out of wack, the top people are paid too much and <br /> the bottom people too little. <br /> Mayor Linke stated he worked in both the city and a corporation and <br /> felt that the upper echelon and lower staff are closer here than in a <br /> corporation. <br /> Mayor Linke commented that the public works people are paid <br /> a union-based salary. Mayor Linke stated that these persons are making <br /> what the union says they should be making. Mayor Linke stated <br /> that Mr. Stigney should be able to support his comments rather <br /> than just throw them out. <br /> Mr. Stigney stated that he talked to many of them and they are pinched <br /> for money compared to pay received by others elsewhere. <br /> • <br /> Mayor Linke stated he rides with the police officers every six months <br /> and talks to the public works employees and he doesn't hear those <br /> things . <br /> Mr. Stigney stated that he wanted to make one last statement and that <br /> was that he did not agree with the street light utility and was <br /> opposed to it and that the City should look at the top salaries, <br /> health benefits and insurance being paid. <br /> Mr. Bill Frits stated that he would like to have the words <br /> public hearing added with the sundown amendment. Mr. Frits stated he <br /> did-no-t-trustthe-C-auric-il-and-wanted-a-pu-bIie-hea ng to-be-held <br /> when this ordinance came to the end of the term. <br /> Councilmember Quick stated that this ordinance would end the <br /> utility after two years. Quick further stated at that time if <br /> it were to be continued the whole process would have to be <br /> reenacted including a public hearing. <br /> Mayor Linke stated that on January 1, 1994, unless it goes through the <br /> Council at that time, there will be no utility. Linke stated that <br /> at that point in time it ceases to exist. Linke further stated to <br /> reinstate the utility it would have to go through the public <br /> hearing, first and second reading and be published before it could <br /> • be reinstated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.