My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1991/07/01
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
Agenda Packets - 1991/07/01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:44 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 7:08:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/1/1991
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/1/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE 1992 BUDGET <br /> o Property tax collections are estimated to be 99.5% of the <br /> amount levied. This estimate is based upon collection rates <br /> for the past ten years. <br /> o Licenses and permits are estimated by looking at the trend <br /> of collections for the past three, five, and ten years and <br /> reviewing recently enacted legislation. <br /> o Intergovernmental revenues are budgeted per the amount <br /> estimated by State and County agencies disbursing the <br /> revenues. The estimates provided have had a tendency to be <br /> slightly understated compared to actual revenues received <br /> over the past five years. The numbers provided are used in <br /> the budget as this coincides with the City's policy of <br /> conservatism in budgeting: slightly underestimate revenues <br /> and slightly overstate expenditures. <br /> o Transfers are actual amounts which will be transferred from <br /> one fund to another during the upcoming budget year. <br /> o User fees are based upon several factors: 1) past activity, <br /> 2) projections of future activity, and 3) the principle <br /> that fees charged should cover the costs of providing the <br /> service(s) purchased. Each year the City reviews all fees <br /> for their adequacy in recovering the costs of providing <br /> service(s) and adjusts them accordingly. An example is <br /> utility rates. Past consumption is examined and the number <br /> of units projected to be sold during the budget year is <br /> estimated. To those estimates is added consumption to be <br /> used by new residences and/or businesses based upon a review <br /> of building permits and development agreements. Then the <br /> estimated cost of providing the service is calculated and <br /> compared to the user fees estimated to be received. Should <br /> anticipated user fees prove to be not sufficient to cover the <br /> costs of providing the services they are adjusted until the <br /> fees collected equal the costs of providing the service. <br /> These same factors are considered when setting other types <br /> of user fees. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.