My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1991/06/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
Agenda Packets - 1991/06/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:26 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 7:19:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/10/1991
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/10/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Agenda Section: •8._1 <br /> ©mos REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATIONIlif <br /> Report Number: 91 -25C <br /> Report Date: June 10 , 1 991 <br /> u° STAFF REPORT Council Action: <br /> ❑ Special Order of Business <br /> CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE JUNE 1 0 . 199 1 ❑ Public Hearings <br /> 1 Consent Agenda <br /> D Council Business <br /> Item Description: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A WAGE ADJUSTMENT FOR PAUL HARRINTON , <br /> PLANNER <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: <br /> - No comments to supplement this report <br /> - Comments attached. <br /> Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) <br /> SUMMARY; <br /> Paul Harrington has been with the City in the position of Planning Technician since September 17, 1990. <br /> Although he received a "cost-of-living" or "an annual increase" on January 1st of the year he has not received <br /> a six month pay "step increase". <br /> Pay Equity compliance standards require that compensation systems have established pay ranges or <br /> progression steps which allow an employee to realistically move through the step system in a set amount of <br /> time, i.e., a new employee would have an established pay plan which sets forth the starting pay and each <br /> incremental pay increase and timeframe (based on performance) until the top pay for that position is <br /> achieved. <br /> The top pay for a position is generally set by comparing salaries of comparable positions in other cities. The <br /> best "market" for pay comparisons is the DCA Stanton Report. Published every July, the Stanton lists over <br /> 174 positions commonly found in cities. The positions are compared to those of comparable size with <br /> comparable position responsibilities and scope of duties. <br /> Paul has been an excellent employee. It is my recommendation that Paul receive a 6 month step pay <br /> increase based on the following 5 step pay plan: <br /> Starting Wage Wage at 6 mos. Wage at 1 Yr. Wage at 2 Yrs. Wage at 3 Yrs. <br /> STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 <br /> $11.72 $12.45 $13.18 $13.92 $14.65 <br /> The 5 step plan is basedon market comparisonsprovided in the DCA Stanton Report. Step 5 <br /> is the mean position salary of all the suburban communities with populations of over 10,000. <br /> Each step representsa 5% increasewith the starting wage calculated at 80% of the Stanton <br /> mean. <br /> Paul's current wage is $11.92. However, in order to remain consistentwith the 5 step pay plan, <br /> it is recommendedthat he advanceto the step 2 wage. It is further recommendedthat this <br /> wage increase be retroactive to his 6 month anniversary of March 17, 1991. <br /> SamanthaOrduno, Ci dministrator <br /> RECOMMENDATION; <br /> Waive reading and approve Resolution No. 4090 Authorizing a Wage Adjustment for Paul <br /> Harrington, Planner <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.