My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-03-1991 WS
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
06-03-1991 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2018 7:22:39 AM
Creation date
7/18/2018 7:22:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/3/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> Overview of the 1991 omnibus tax bill <br /> The 1991 omnibus tax bill (HF1698)has many more positive features than <br /> negative ones for cities. <br /> On the up side: <br /> * The LGA/HACA cuts were less than one-tenth of the governor's original <br /> proposal; <br /> * The separation of city property tax relief fund dollars from legislative <br /> manipulation has begun with the dedication of two cents of the sales tax,part of which is <br /> adopted locally; <br /> * The third tier classification rate on homestead property is being reduced over a <br /> two-year period without the tax cost shifting to other property; <br /> * The 1991 revenue base is restored to its pre-cut level before 1992 cuts - which <br /> may be recovered by levy - are calculated; and, <br /> * The promise for 1993 levy limit repeal remains intact. <br /> On the down side: <br /> * Cities and counties will lose an additional$35 million LGA/HACA in the <br /> December 1991 payment(approximately 1.6 percent of revenue base, or equivalent to <br /> about 80 percent of the July 1991 cuts), and <br /> *The overall levy base is frozen at the 1991 pre-cut level and contains no growth <br /> factor. <br /> For comparative purposes, the total 1991-92 LGA/HACA cuts beyond the$51 <br /> million 1992 cut passed in the 1990 tax bill is $70 million. The governor's proposal was <br /> $639 million; the Senate bill was $125 million and the House bill, $25 million. <br /> L Local Sales Tax Option <br /> CITY RESOLUTIONS IN SUPPORT OF COUNTY BOARDS ADOPTING LOCAL SALES <br /> TAX OPTION <br /> The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities urges member city councils <br /> to pass resolutions in support of their county boards to adopt the one-half cent sales <br /> tax by the July 1, 1991, deadline. <br /> The sales tax automatically will increase to 6.5 percent for the period July 1, <br /> 1991-,_through Dec. 31, 1991. If the one-h• •- - • • • •• • i • •••pted, the sales tax <br /> within the county reverts to 6 percent- not 4.5 percent - and all aid is lost to the county <br /> and cities in that county's borders. Of the 6 percent sales tax, the difference- or 1.5 <br /> percent-will go to the Local Government Trust Fund as a windfall for other cities and <br /> counties. In a county not adopting the one-half cent option, the lost aid to each unit of <br /> government may be replaced by additional property tax levy. <br /> If a county board fails to act by July 1, 1991, the governing bodies of cities and <br /> towns within the county totalling at least 50 percent of the county population may make <br /> the option choice for the county. <br /> It is important for cities to act quickly in support of their county boards to <br /> help absorb the difficult political decision of increasing the sales tax by one-half <br /> cent. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.