My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-03-1991 WS
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
06-03-1991 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2018 7:22:39 AM
Creation date
7/18/2018 7:22:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/3/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> If a property in a TIF district becomes tax exempt because of a default and <br /> acquisition by the authority, when that property is returned to the tax rolls its value at the <br /> time of the initial certification will be used in the original net tax capacity. <br /> Adjustments to the original net tax capacity of economic development districts for <br /> inflation will be made using the growth in market value rather than tax capacity. For <br /> parcels with demolished substandard buildings that the authority elects to treat as still <br /> occupied substandard buildings,the original net tax capacity is the higher of: 1. current <br /> tax capacity or 2. the tax capacity before the demolition but at the current class ratio. <br /> Property owners who are not developers may enter into assessment agreements. <br /> Assessment agreements also may be entered into for existing properties in the TIF district <br /> that are not being developed. The assessment agreement may provide for increases or <br /> decreases in the minimum market value over the term of the agreement. <br /> IX. Truth in Taxation Changes <br /> Several significant changes occurred in Truth in Taxation matters. Among them: <br /> * Deletion of the requirement to provide time and place of the second meeting on <br /> the initial proposed property tax notice; <br /> * Requirement that an estimated percentage change in the levy be calculated as <br /> well as a total percentage change weighted in relation to each taxing authority's <br /> proportion of the total levy; <br /> * Requirement that TIF and fiscal disparities, when applicable, be stated <br /> separately; <br /> * Requirement that owners of class 4 residential rental property mail or deliver a <br /> copy of the notice to each tenant, or post a notice in a conspicuous place on the premises; <br /> * Use of business days rather than calendar days regarding publication notice; <br /> * Exemption of cities having populations of less than 1,000 from advertising <br /> notice (they must post notice, however); <br /> * Requirement that cities with populations between 1,000 and 2,500 publish an <br /> advertisement that is one-eighth of a page; <br /> * Requirement that cities with populations over 2,500 publish an advertisement <br /> that is one-fourth of a page; and, <br /> * Allowance of an additional levy exceeding the proposed levy if the half-cent <br /> optional sales tax is not adopted. <br /> X. Fiscal Disparities -Technical Changes <br /> Several changes were made to laws governing fiscal disparities. The technical <br /> changes: <br /> * Eliminate the never-used municipal equity account and obsolete language; <br /> * Permit the Metropolitan Council and the Commissioner of Revenue to make the <br /> determination that a municipality consciously excluded C/I development and, therefore, <br /> is ineligible to participate in the fiscal disparities program; <br /> * Direct that contributions will be made based on equalized market value rather <br /> than the assessor's stated market value; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.