My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/04/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/04/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:34 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 4:18:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/24/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/24/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
295
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council April 10, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 16 <br /> <br />achieve consistent terminology throughout the City Charter. He stated the items are pieces or 1 <br />elements of the plan. He stated that within Chapter 7, the Commission has tried to achieve 2 <br />consistency throughout the whole chapter. He indicated for the process to work, there must be 3 <br />total and complete agreement. He noted that Councilmember Stigney did not have any 4 <br />suggestions on how to make the wording consistent at the Work Session. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he did not care how the breakdown was described, but that he was 7 <br />against renaming items to elements that are already defined as programs. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Councilmember Thomas wondered what makes the item a program. She stated the word 10 <br />“program” is being used incorrectly, and the items should be referred to as an element as part of 11 <br />the financial plan. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated the term “element” is in the correct context as a portion of the 14 <br />entity. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated that any amendment would result in the resolution being brought 17 <br />back to the Charter Commission. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Mayor Marty stated he concurred with Councilmember Stigney. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Councilmember Gunn stated that the whole purpose of the Charter Commission is to go through 22 <br />the Charter and update it to make it more relevant to today. She stated that changing the wording 23 <br />to element makes more sense. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Mr. Thomas indicated that Councilmember Stigney helped two and three years ago, and no 26 <br />response was received this year, and now at the process of adoption, he is bantering over the 27 <br />word “element” and leaving out the improvements of seven pages of incredibly difficult work to 28 <br />do over three years. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Councilmember Stigney indicated that a closer look should be taken at the word “element”. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Mr. Thomas stated that Councilmember Stigney should have asked him a year ago about this. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Mayor Marty asked if the resolution was presented a year ago. Mr. Thomas stated it was. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Mr. Thomas stated that copies were distributed and people could have been working on it. He 37 <br />stated that work is being done in a statutory environment where nothing can be changed tonight 38 <br />without the Charter Commission discussing it. He indicated it is difficult to grasp reworking the 39 <br />entire chapter because someone does not like the word “element”. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Councilmember Stigney suggested that it be brought back to the Charter Commission because 42 <br />there will be no unanimous vote. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Mr. Thomas stated there is a timeline to deal with for the ballot issue on Chapter 7.03 that is 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.