My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/05/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/05/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:51 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 4:22:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/8/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/8/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council April 24, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 31 <br /> <br />Mr. Amundsen asked City Attorney Riggs that when the act of an individual indicates intent. 1 <br />City Attorney Riggs stated that it depends on the issue. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated that if the car is parked closer, there is a clear code violation, but 4 <br />until that happens, there is not a code violation. She noted it comes down to a matter of 5 <br />subjective interpretation and she cannot see that there has been a code violation for the Council 6 <br />to enforce. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Mayor Marty stated the Planning Commission needs to clear up the code. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Mr. Amundsen confirmed that the Council’s policy is that retaining walls can be built up to the 11 <br />property line and that this policy is set by non-action. He confirmed that in past practices, the 12 <br />building department has approved permits for retaining walls up to the property line, will 13 <br />continue to stand. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Mayor Marty stated that is correct until it is changed. He noted the Planning Commission will 16 <br />start looking at the code. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Councilmember Flaherty commented that the adjacent property owner is not before the Council 19 <br />to determine if there is an amiable situation. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Mr. Amundsen stated he is asking the Council to have the other party be engaged. He wondered 22 <br />if the building department could assure that the additional six or eight inches will be removed by 23 <br />the adjacent property owner. Mr. Amundsen pointed out that he will still have to put up more 24 <br />fencing and find remedies to pay for the additional fencing 25 <br /> 26 <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated there is nothing precluding the City from getting all parties 27 <br />together to work out an agreement. He stated the City would be willing to potentially mediate 28 <br />this issue. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Mrs. Amundsen asked if City Administrator Ulrich would set up the meeting with the adjacent 31 <br />property owner. City Administrator Ulrich indicated he would. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Mrs. Amundsen stated she they are reasonable and concerned citizens and that they hope to leave 34 <br />with the impression that they never intended to be bad neighbors. She stated they plan to live in 35 <br />the neighborhood for many more years. She indicated that unless something can be worked out 36 <br />in the next couple of weeks, they will be forced to spend money to improve the fence. She stated 37 <br />they will probably come to the Council if the situation cannot be resolved with the neighbor. She 38 <br />commented that they feel forced into that situation. 39 <br /> 40 <br />8. CONSENT AGENDA 41 <br /> 42 <br />Mayor Marty asked to remove Item C. 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.