Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council April 24, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 35 <br /> <br />City Administrator stated that last year when this question was adopted, the City was in a 1 <br />different place with the street improvement plan. He suggested there is less of a need to ask a 2 <br />street question. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated that it is a decent question because it encourages residents to take 5 <br />part in the process, but she does not want it to get too complicated. 6 <br /> 7 <br />The Council, with the exception of Councilmember Stigney, agreed to leave the question as 8 <br />stated. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated that the eighth question does not indicate what the funding source 11 <br />is. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Mayor Marty suggested this question should be removed because the second option is not an 14 <br />option anymore. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Councilmember suggested that the second option should read that no changes are needed. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated that it does not define the fitness center that is being considered. 19 <br />He asked if the question can be pulled. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated this question might be difficult to work out right now with the 22 <br />current situation. 23 <br /> 24 <br />The Council agreed to remove the question. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Mayor Marty stated that Staff made good choices on the questions that will be asked. 27 <br /> 28 <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that the church indicated that April would be the last month that 29 <br />they would be occupying the building. He noted the City will be sending a final invoice for 30 <br />services and space. He noted they were paying $1,500 per month to Canyon Grill for the space 31 <br />they were occupying, so this will be empty space. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Mayor Marty asked if they have a contract with Canyon Grill. City Administrator Ulrich stated it 34 <br />appears to be a 30 day contract, and City Attorney Riggs is reviewing. 35 <br /> 36 <br />City Attorney Riggs stated there is a 180 day notice provision in the lease, but it is not there any 37 <br />more. He stated that they appear to be on a 30 day term at this point, although the City is the 38 <br />successor under the lease. He noted Staff will resolve that and send a notice to clarify what is 39 <br />going on. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated that the City was clear when the situation was terminated with 42 <br />Canyon Grill that was set up as a 30 day term. 43 <br /> 44