My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/05/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/05/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:51 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 4:22:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/8/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/8/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council April 24, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 11 <br /> <br />Hall about this. He stated he would like this matter resolved, and he was under the impression 1 <br />that there would be a vote tonight. He stressed that Clear Channel has been working as hard as 2 <br />possible to come up with a solution to please the City. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked for a rendering of what the billboard will look like. Mr. 5 <br />McCarver stated he would try to do that. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Councilmember Stigney commented that at the last Council meeting, the Ordinance was 8 <br />approved and then reconsidered because the number of billboards within the City was not 9 <br />restricted. 10 <br /> 11 <br />MOTION/SECOND: STIGNEY/MARTY. To waive the reading and approve Ordinance 769, 12 <br />an Ordinance Amending Chapter 1008 of the Municipal Code relating to Signs and Billboards. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Councilmember Stigney commented that this is a 30 year proposition and it is inappropriate to 15 <br />have billboards on County Road 10 as one enters into the City. He stated the relocation meant 16 <br />that the City would need to come up with alternate locations to put billboards in. He recalled that 17 <br />City Administrator Ulrich indicated at the last meeting that the City has provided ample space in 18 <br />which to relocate the billboards. He noted that if billboards were not such an eyesore, then 19 <br />Medtronic would have kept them. He stated he had a problem with the past language that gave 20 <br />preferential treatment to the Mermaid only. He stated it is best for the long term to keep 21 <br />billboards off County Road 10, and that is how the Ordinance currently reads. 22 <br /> 23 <br />AMENDMENT MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/GUNN. To amend the Ordinance in regard to 24 <br />Subdivision 6, Section 9, Item B, relating to location (and any other parts that need to be 25 <br />adjusted), to remove Old Highway 8 and insert County Highway 10 south of Woodale Drive at 26 <br />the entrance to Mounds View in the commercial area only. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated this is the opposite of what the City should be doing. He stated 29 <br />for the next 30 years, the Mermaid will have up to two signs on County Road 10 to the exclusion 30 <br />of any other place. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Mr. McCarver explained one sign is proposed. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated the Ordinance does not limit it to one sign. He stated billboards 35 <br />do not belong on County Road 10. He stressed the City is going to spend money to beautify the 36 <br />area, and now there will be billboards for the next 30 years for the preferential treatment of the 37 <br />Mermaid only. 38 <br /> 39 <br />City Administrator Ulrich noted that there is a spacing requirement of 500 feet. He wondered 40 <br />what the frontage is on Highway 10. Director Ericson stated he could not answer as to the length 41 <br />between County Road H north to the Mermaid property. 42 <br /> 43
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.