Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council May 8, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 15 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />City Administrator Ulrich wondered how the ordinance applies to signs in other communities. 2 <br />Director Ericson stated the ordinance is silent on whether it is measured from other communities. 3 <br />He stated that ordinances typically do not take the next community into consideration. He stated 4 <br />that if the issue was looked at literally, and the minimum spacing between billboards was 1,500 5 <br />feet, that would be a gray area because there is a billboard on the other side in New Brighton. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Director Ericson suggested an additional amendment could be to specify the spacing for Old 8 <br />Highway 8. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Councilmember Thomas suggested adding language to only specify billboards in the City of 11 <br />Mounds View. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated that Clear Channel may have an issue with this, and he is trying 14 <br />to find as many spots as possible for Clear Channel. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Director Ericson stated that there may be an overriding issue with MnDOT if the Old Highway 8 17 <br />location would be permitted by MnDOT because it can be viewed from I-35W. He stated if that 18 <br />is the case, it would be subject to the 500 foot separation and it would be taken into the 19 <br />consideration for the New Brighton sign. He stated there is the assurance that there will still be a 20 <br />500 feet separation. He stated he did not know if Old Highway 8 would be permitted by MnDOT 21 <br />and it may be a question for Clear Channel. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated that the City can give its best shot for possible sites, but the City 24 <br />cannot control the states’ rulings. 25 <br /> 26 <br /> Ayes – 3 Nays – 2 (Marty, Stigney) Amendment Motion carried. 27 <br /> 28 <br />AMENDMENT MOTION/SECOND: STIGNEY/FLAHERTY. To allow billboards on Old 29 <br />Highway 8. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated that in making a good faith effort, specific locations should not be 32 <br />ruled and the ordinance should be made as open as possible. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated she cannot support billboards that close to residential areas. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he feels a 250 feet setback is adequate. 37 <br /> 38 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 1 (Thomas) Amendment Motion carried. 39 <br /> 40 <br />AMENDMENT MOTION/SECOND: STIGNEY/MARTY. To remove the 1,500 foot spacing 41 <br />requirement for Old Highway 8 and change the spacing requirement to 500 feet. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Director Ericson stated that it may be easier to offer an amendment that would allow for 44 <br />minimum spacing to be 500 feet with the exception of County Road 10 which is 1,500 feet. He 45