My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/05/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/05/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:03 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 4:32:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/22/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/22/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council May 8, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 20 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked for more information on Change Order 18. Director of Public 2 <br />Works Lee stated that there is a newly created desk in front of where the Public Works 3 <br />department and Administration will be. He explained there needs to be a gate in front of the desk 4 <br />for security purposes. He stated that this item was originally intended but was missed in the 5 <br />original bid. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Mayor Marty commented that City Hall would not be able to locked without this gate. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Mayor Marty wondered why this gate was not included in the original bid. He wondered if SEH 10 <br />could be responsible for the costs of the gate since it should have been included in the original 11 <br />bid price. He noted that if this item would have been bid out, the City might have received a 12 <br />more favorable bid as opposed to a change order. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Councilmember Thomas commented that everything was behind a locked door before the 15 <br />remodel project, so a gate was not necessary before. 16 <br /> 17 <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that Public Works was relocated in the building, and now gate 18 <br />security is required. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Councilmember Thomas commented that the SEH cannot be made responsible since it was not in 21 <br />the plans and specifications approved by the City Council. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Director of Public Works Lee commented that Staff does have a call into SEH and this item will 24 <br />be discussed. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Mayor Marty asked if there will be any additional change orders. Director of Public Works Lee 27 <br />stated that a list of change orders was provided to the Council two months ago and there are no 28 <br />additional change orders from that list. He commented that there are two or three more change 29 <br />orders left to be approved from that list. 30 <br /> 31 <br />MOTION/SECOND: MARTY/FLAHERTY. To waive the reading and approve Resolution 32 <br />6810 Approving Change Orders No. 18 and 19 for the City Hall Rehabilitation Project. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Councilmember Stigney commented that the original budget for the City Hall Rehabilitation 35 <br />Project was $1.6 million, and the cost is currently at $1.5374 million. He noted the City is going 36 <br />to spend right up to $1.6 million. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Mayor Marty asked if the Staff report for this item included window treatments. Director of 39 <br />Public Works Lee stated it did not. 40 <br /> 41 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 42 <br /> 43 <br />8F. Resolution 6806 Proclaiming May 9, 2006 as Arbor Day. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.