Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 15 <br /> <br />Councilmember Thomas stated she agrees and likes Option 2, noting that in the second survey 1 <br />the opposition numbers go down and the support goes up for Project Areas B and E. She 2 <br />commented on the need to activate the community and noted that maybe starting a road project 3 <br />will help to do that. Councilmember Thomas thanked staff for sending out the second survey to 4 <br />determine trends and areas of support. She stated her support to move forward with Option 2 5 <br />since the numbers of support are not present for Project Areas contained in Option 1. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Councilmember Stigney noted the majority are opposed in Project Areas A, B, D, and F and in 8 <br />Area E there is only support by five votes. He stated if the Council is going to act against the 9 <br />survey results, they should stop doing surveys. Councilmember Stigney stated if something is 10 <br />approved, he would support Project Areas A, B, and E (Option 1). 11 <br /> 12 <br />Public Works Director Lee explained there will be an economy of scale to centrally locate the 13 <br />project but if Project Areas A, B, and E are approved, it may not make that much difference. He 14 <br />recommended keeping Project Areas B and E together since they are joined and share traffic 15 <br />issues. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Councilmember Stigney reviewed the numbers in support and opposition of the Project Areas 18 <br />and again stated if you listen to the people, only one area supports a road project and there have 19 <br />been two opportunities to vote on this issue. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated she didn’t ask them to vote, but to state their opinion and she 22 <br />took that into consideration. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated the survey results are disheartening since the project is long 25 <br />overdue and the streets are crumbling, as is his own road. He stated he looks at what the 26 <br />residents are saying and Councilmember Stigney is correct that only one area supports it. 27 <br />However, he thinks this is something that has to be done, noting it will improve home values 28 <br />when the streets are improved. Councilmember Flaherty stated he supports moving forward with 29 <br />Project Areas A, B, and E (Option 1). 30 <br /> 31 <br />Mayor Marty stated he could also support Project Areas A, B, and E (Option 1). 32 <br /> 33 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked staff’s preference. Public Works Director Lee stated his opinion 34 <br />would be to move forward with Project Areas A, B, and E (Option 1). He noted that there are 35 <br />two segments in Project Area A on Sherwood Road that are actually in better condition than the 36 <br />rest of Project Area A. Those two segments could be dropped if the property owners agree to not 37 <br />be included, which would greatly increase resident support for Project Area A. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated the next step would be to hold a neighborhood meeting with 40 <br />the three Project Areas and consider their input in the project. 41 <br /> 42 <br /> Councilmember Thomas asked what would be the impact on the project if there is further 43 <br />development in the LaPort Meadows area. She also asked how it would impact the project if that 44 <br />section of Sherwood Road is removed from the project. Public Works Director Lee stated those 45