Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 21 <br /> <br />loses the case and the FCC thinks the City has abused its authority, the FCC can order the City to 1 <br />pay the legal fees of the license holder and costs associated with the appeal. This will inhibit the 2 <br />ability for the City to protect and enforce its rights-of-way. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Ms. Wilson stated these bills will allow national franchise companies to come into the City and 5 <br />take over the area. They also do not have to serve all of Mounds View and can select the most 6 <br />lucrative areas to provide service. Currently, the cable company is required to serve the entire 7 <br />community within a reasonable amount of time, considering the density threshold. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Ms. Wilson stated that Representative Ramstad said he is not interested in inserting the 10 <br />requirement to serve the entire community. She explained that under the Senate bill, once a 11 <br />company applies for a national franchise to serve Mounds View, Comcast can get out of its 12 <br />existing franchise and there is nothing to prohibit them from increasing their prices where there is 13 <br />no competition and vice versa. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Ms. Wilson stated another concern is that due to the short period of time to approve the 16 <br />application at the FCC or local level, the bill allows Qwest and Verizon to get into the business. 17 <br />She noted there can be unscrupulous people making application with no intention of building the 18 <br />system or building it out completely, so it creates an opportunity for speculation using the City’s 19 <br />public rights-of-way as the lure. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Ms. Wilson advised the Senate bill includes a definition of gross revenues, which will drastically 22 <br />cut back what the City is receiving. However, the gross revenue definition contained in the 23 <br />House bill is not as bad as the Senate bill. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Ms. Wilson stated the resolution before the Council addresses both pieces of legislation. She 26 <br />encouraged the Council to contact members of the Minnesota Delegation because the only way to 27 <br />slow down the bills or stop them is if all stand and speak together. Ms. Wilson stated the 28 <br />information she provided has been prepared by a local coalition of government associations and 29 <br />based on the Senate bill, which is similar to the House bill. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked how the Minnesota Senators stand on this issue. Ms. Wilson 32 <br />stated they have been talking with them but not been able to get a sense in how they will vote. 33 <br />She stated they will be meeting with Senator Coleman in the next few weeks and Senator 34 <br />Ramstad has not yet been brief on this bill. Ms. Wilson stated the League of Minnesota Cities is 35 <br />working on this issue and the City needs to do the same. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Mayor Marty asked how long she has known about the bills. Ms. Wilson stated the House bill 38 <br />came up in mid-March and the first draft of the House bill was out in September of last year. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked who introduced the bill. Ms. Wilson stated it was Joe Barton, the 41 <br />Senator from Texas who is the Chair of the House Conference Committee. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Ms. Wilson explained they have been working with staff from the inside to try and get the needed 44 <br />language. In mid-March they saw the House bill and had hoped the Senate bill would be better, 45