Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 27 <br /> <br />Mayor Marty asked whether the City will have to install fire suppression in the Groveland 1 <br />building. Public Works Director Lee stated he has been told that the Groveland building, as 2 <br />proposed, would require fire suppression. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Community Development Director Ericson stated that when the Hillview warming house was 5 <br />reviewed, and the Building Official indicated that perhaps it should have been approved as 6 <br />something other than a ā€œUā€ occupancy. He advised that the Code is clear that this building is an 7 <br />ā€œAā€ occupancy and sprinkling is required, as indicated by the Public Works Director. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated she spoke with City Administrator Ulrich about this issue and 10 <br />learned it is something the City has to do but she questioned why the City did not know this 11 <br />would be required. She stated this is a big issue to have missed and she wants to assure 12 <br />something like that is not missed in the future. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Mayor Marty noted the Council is now being asked to proceed with the installation. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated that it would be disingenuous for the Council to consider 17 <br />changing the ordinance based on this issue. He asked if the cost to monitor the system is built 18 <br />into this cost. Public Works Director Lee stated it is not and he will have to look into that cost. 19 <br />He noted that Viking is currently monitoring the City Hall system. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he doubts there will be 300 occupants in this building and it 22 <br />would be ridiculous to have to install a sprinkling system for occasional meetings. He stated this 23 <br />is no different than Hillview and perhaps the Code has gone too far to require the installation of 24 <br />sprinkling systems in other buildings where it is not needed. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Mayor Marty stated this is different than Hillview because before it was moved, the Random 27 <br />Park building was used ten times more often for group meetings and activities than other park 28 <br />shelters. Councilmember Stigney stated Hillview is used for the same purposes and also has to 29 <br />be reserved. He stated if it is a Code issue, then the Code should be reviewed. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Director Ericson stated the Code amendment was recommended for adoption by the Fire Chief 32 <br />for our three City Fire Districts and been in place since 1983. He stated it is not the City Code, it 33 <br />is a State amendment that the City adopted and they may not want to go backwards to not require 34 <br />a sprinkling system in a City building even if occupancy is under the 300 threshold. He stated he 35 <br />thinks the Fire Chief would caution the City against going backwards on that Code because of the 36 <br />usage of this building and it is consistent with the three cities of Mounds View, Spring Lake 37 <br />Park, and Blaine. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Mayor Marty concurred and stated the Random Park building is a nice structure but it is a stick 40 <br />structure. The Hillview Park building is a cinder block structure. Due to the fact Random Park 41 <br />is used ten times more than any other park building, from a safety aspect, he has no problem with 42 <br />adding the sprinkling system to bring it up to Code. 43 <br /> 44