My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/06/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/06/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:29 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 4:40:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/12/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/12/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 29 <br /> <br />former City Administrator Chuck Whiting to do anything and asked what they told Chief 1 <br />Ramacher. 2 <br /> 3 <br />City Attorney Alsop stated from what he was told, the former Mayor was more directly involved. 4 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated the former Mayor had no authority to be involved. 5 <br /> 6 <br />City Attorney Alsop explained that based on what the former City Administrator said and the 7 <br />public record; there is no indication that Mr. Ramacher was offered a lump sum or premium 8 <br />payout. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked whether he got a statement from the former City Administrator 11 <br />that he did not make that offer. City Attorney Alsop stated he cannot prove something that did 12 <br />not happen. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he wants to receive that statement from former City Administrator 15 <br />Whiting and the Assistant City Administrator. City Attorney Alsop stated the Assistant City 16 <br />Administrator said she has no recollection. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Mayor Marty stated the Council said Mr. Ramacher had no option. Councilmember Stigney 19 <br />asked where is the video tape or the meeting minutes that state that. 20 <br /> 21 <br />City Attorney Alsop stated he talked to all Councilmembers and all said they have no 22 <br />recollection. He stated it is clear that an option was not offered to former Police Chief Ramacher 23 <br />and the resolution itself indicated what he was going to get. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked again for a statement from former City Administrator Chuck 26 <br />Whiting saying he offered no option to Chief Ramacher. He noted this would protect the City. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Councilmember Thomas recommended that the City Attorney’s office be authorized to proceed 29 <br />to fix this issue. 30 <br /> 31 <br />MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/GUNN. To direct the City staff to work with the City Attorney 32 <br />to resolve the tax issue. 33 <br /> 34 <br />AMENDMENT MOTION: STIGNEY/ To direct the City Attorney to obtain a written statement 35 <br />from former City Administrator Chuck Whiting that he did not offer former Police Chief 36 <br />Ramacher any option. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Amendment motion died for lack of a second. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Councilmember Stigney restated his support to protect the City by obtaining a written statement 41 <br />from former City Administrator Chuck Whiting. 42 <br /> 43
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.