Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Clear Channel IUP Report <br />July 10, 2006 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />(6) The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> <br />The Comprehensive Plan does not contemplate or address the issue of billboards. As such, <br />staff would suggest that the IUP request is not inconsistent with the Comp Plan. <br /> <br />(7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. <br /> <br />It is not anticipated that a billboard at the Mermaid site would not cause traffic hazards or <br />congestion. <br /> <br />(8) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary facilities have been or will be <br />provided. <br /> <br />Access to the billboards will be gained via the Mermaid’s parking lot. <br /> <br /> <br />Public Notice: <br /> <br />Staff sent notices to property owners within 350 feet of the Mermaid property and published <br />a copy of the notice in the June 28, 2006 edition of the Bulletin. While no public comment <br />has been received in response to the City Council hearing notice, three separate residents <br />(addressed on Sherwood Road, Eastwood Road and Sunnyside Road) had contacted me to <br />express their opposition to the granting of a variance for additional height, a request the <br />Planning Commission did ultimately deny. Mr. John Kopas, owner of the adjacent Abbey <br />Carpet building, appeared before the Planning Commission on June 21 to express concern <br />as to the location of the proposed billboard and the potential for the sign to obstruct his <br />property. Mr. Kopas would later draft a letter that was provided to the Planning Commission <br />in the July 5th staff report in which he consented to the siting of the billboard at the proposed <br />location, no longer believing the billboard would be an obstruction, as long as the height of <br />the billboard were 45 feet. One resident (Mr. Ken Glidden) spoke in opposition to the IUP <br />and variance request on July 5. Mr. Glidden urged the Planning Commission to not lose <br />sight of the fact that a billboard on County Road 10 would impact everyone that travels the <br />roadway, not just the adjoining property owners. He felt the siting of a billboard in the <br />corridor was contrary to the overall corridor redevelopment efforts being undertaken by the <br />City <br /> <br />Summary: <br /> <br />The requested Interim Use Permit appears to satisfy all Code requirements and would not <br />appear to cause any appreciable adverse impacts to the area in which the billboard would be <br />located. While some argue that any billboard on County Road 10 is contrary to the City’s <br />goal of improving and enhancing the image and appeal of the corridor, this site has been <br />identified by the City Council as a potential location for a billboard. The Mermaid has <br />determined that a billboard at the proposed location would not be or cause an obstruction so <br />long as the height of the proposed billboard is allowed at 45 feet. Mr. Kopas of Abbey <br />Carpet also believes the billboard would not be an obstruction if erected at a 45 foot height. <br />