My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/07/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/07/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:09 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 5:07:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/24/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/24/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
286
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 26, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 23 <br /> <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that on May 22, the Council authorized a feasibility report for 1 <br />street improvement program. He stated the City wanted to meet with residents to determine 2 <br />issues and concerns. He said an informational meeting was held on June 13 and about 50 people 3 <br />attended. He said one of the items had several mini-topics and a feedback form. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Director Lee said street design and curbing was one of the main issues discussed. He said 10 of 6 <br />14 feedback forms touched on street design and curbing, that 9 of 10 were in favor, and 7 7 <br />indicated they would go along with the project. He added that only one person was against the 8 <br />project. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Director Lee said 10 of the 11 were opposed to public walkways. He said the City does have a 11 <br />trail way plan and trail way advocacy group that submitted a report in 1992. He stated Staff is 12 <br />recommending that these are included in the feasibility report to identify issues surrounding 13 <br />providing pedestrian corridors in the areas and the cost associated with them. 14 <br />Director Lee stated another issue is mailbox grouping. He said the City has an ordinance that 15 <br />when streets are re-done, the mailboxes be grouped. He said of the 14 feedback forms submitted, 16 <br />four of them commented on the mailbox grouping and two were opposed, two were indifferent. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Director Lee said that one of the main issues is traffic volumes and speed in the area. He said it 19 <br />was nearly unanimous that this was a concern. He said Staff will recommend a proposal for 20 <br />traffic study of the northwest quadrant of the City. He stated this will collect data about this part 21 <br />of the City, identify the issues as far as traffic volume and speed, and then provide a list of 22 <br />possible solutions that could be implemented. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Director Lee said as to the issue of whether to include the segment of Sherwood Road, Staff 25 <br />recommends sending a survey to property owners on the segment asking if they do or do not 26 <br />want to be included with the project. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Director Lee addressed the elimination of the Hillview/Fairchild access to County Road 10 and 29 <br />stated Staff recommends that they continue with the plan and incorporates this into the feasibility 30 <br />report. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Director said Staff is recommending the approval of six items to be included in the feasibility 33 <br />report: 34 <br />1. Street Design Option that was implemented in 2004 which included concrete curbing 35 <br />and gutter; 36 <br />2. Trail ways as indicated by the City’s comprehensive trail way plan; 37 <br />3. Mailbox grouping as required by City code; 38 <br />4. Following the County Road 10 improvement plan as adopted in August 2002 indicating 39 <br />the closing of the Hillview/Fairchild access; 40 <br />5. Including Sherwood Road segments between Long Lake Road and Edgewood Drive 41 <br />only if property owners indicate a desire to be included by a popular vote; 42 <br />6. Any other items as directed by the City Council. 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.