My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/07/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/07/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:09 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 5:07:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/24/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/24/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
286
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 26, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 28 <br /> <br />David Jahnke, said that he agrees that a fitness center is a die-hard option. He said he has not 1 <br />talked to anyone who believes a fitness center is needed. He questions spending $600,000 on a 2 <br />City-run fitness center. He said he is opposed to the City saying they can make money with the 3 <br />fitness center. He said postponing it and asking residents for feedback is his preference. 4 <br /> 5 <br />CONTINUATION OF MEETING 10:45 p.m. 6 <br /> 7 <br />MOTION/SECOND: MARTY/GUNN. To extend the City Council meeting until the agenda is 8 <br />finished. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked that the meeting be postponed after this item because at the end 11 <br />of meetings, things are rushed. He said either more meetings need to happen or shorter agendas. 12 <br />He feels that the things farther down on the agenda do not get due diligence. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Mayor ,Councilmember Thomas, Councilmember Gunn, and Councilmember Flaherty stated 15 <br />their opinion that the meeting should continue until finished. 16 <br /> 17 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Mayor Marty said he spoke with City Administrator Ulrich about it and agreed about the 20 <br />feasibility report. He stated the feedback he has gotten is that residents are questioning the 21 <br />exercise center. He stated there are fitness centers in the area and questioned the City’s fitness 22 <br />center’s necessity. He added his biggest concern is whether or not the City could get the 23 <br />necessary memberships. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Mayor Marty said he asked about the City subsidizing the Community Center and does not want 26 <br />to spend money for the study. He suggested it be put on the ballot as a referendum item to ask 27 <br />the citizens exactly what they want. He said several years ago the Police Department was put on 28 <br />a referendum question and passed. He suggested between now and the election, that the City put 29 <br />out RFPs to find out what other ideas there are for the building. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Councilmember Gunn asked what the RFPs would be for. Mayor Marty said something could 32 <br />come in that was never discussed before. Councilmember Gunn asked if RFPs have to be 33 <br />something specific. Councilmember Thomas stated that a “general” RFP could not be put out. 34 <br />Mayor Marty said he believes it should go on the ballot to let the citizens decide. 35 <br />Councilmember Gunn asked about the rest of the project, Mayor Marty asked for it to be put on 36 <br />hold. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Councilmember Thomas asked what would be put on the ballot and pointed out with the Police 39 <br />Department the City already did the research. She said that the information must be there in 40 <br />order to put it on the ballot. She said even if it was on the ballot, the research must be done first. 41 <br />She added she likes the referendum on the ballot, but that the market analysis must be done first. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Mayor Marty stated he just came up with the idea after deciding $28,000 was too much to spend 44 <br />on the research. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.