Agenda Packets - 2006/07/24 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council July 10, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 15 MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/STIGNEY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 1 6878, Denying the Appeal of a Variance Denial for 2,468 Square Feet of Accessory Storage 2 Space at 8135 Long Lake Road. 3 4 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 5 6 F. 7:30 pm Public Hearing to Consider Resolution 6879 Pertaining to a PUD 7 Amendment at 2442 County Road 10 to Add “Print Production and 8 Fabrication Shop” as a Permitted Use and to Add “Attached Accessory 9 Building” as a Permitted Accessory Use. 10 11 Director Ericson explained that this item is for a change in the PUD for the proposed property. 12 He stated that Landcor has a prospective tenant interested in leasing the entire building and to 13 accommodate the tenant, Landcor would like an accessory building. 14 15 Mayor Marty left the meeting at 9:04 p.m. 16 17 Director Ericson stated after the Planning Commission reviewed the PUD, he toured the area and 18 said that there is almost an industrial feel to the location. He stated there are many printers and 19 large-scale industrial plotters that would not normally be housed office. He stated that it is a 20 situation where the Planning Commission did not have the information regarding the property 21 and proposed tenant. 22 23 Director Ericson stated that in 2003, the PUD was allowed for the construction of the building. 24 He stated that when the Planning Commission reviewed the amendment for the addition of the 25 accessory building, it would be allowable considering it was made out of the same building 26 material. 27 28 Director Ericson stated it would take up some parking stalls, but the office building does have 29 enough stalls. He stated that the Planning Commission supports the accessory building, but it is 30 up to the Council to determine if a print production company is consistent with the 31 comprehensive plan. 32 33 Director Ericson stated that the Council specifically determined what they would like in the 34 location, a restaurant, but it did not go through. He added that the Council did grant the location 35 use as an office building, but must determine if a print production company is wanted in the 36 location. 37 38 Director Ericson stated Staff recommends approval. Staff has not received any feedback 39 regarding the property and at this point, it is up to the Council to determine what the City’s vision 40 is for the property. 41 42 Acting Mayor Stigney opened the public hearing at 9:09 p.m. 43 44 Robert Fields, LandCor Construction, gave a brief background of the location. He stated that a 45