My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/07/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/07/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:09 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 5:07:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/24/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/24/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
286
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item No: 7C <br />Meeting Date: July 24, 2006 <br />Type of Business: PH & CB <br />Administrator Review: _____ <br /> <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Community Development Director <br />Item Title/Subject: Public Hearing and Consideration of an Ordinance <br />Amending the Procedures and Regulations Pertaining <br />to Dog Kennels <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />Upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission, staff has drafted an ordinance to <br />amend Chapters 701 and 1106 of the Mounds View Municipal Code that would eliminate <br />residential dog / cat Kennels as a permitted conditional use in residential districts. <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />The basis for this proposed amendment is that presently any resident with three or four dogs <br />has to go through a conditional use permit (CUP) process with the planning commission and <br />city council subject to redundant public hearing and notification requirement. The problem <br />with the process is that a CUP runs with the land, not the property owner, which means if the <br />resident gets a CUP then moves, the CUP stays at the former property, which is not the <br />intent. The other rationale behind the amendment is that having three or four dogs is not <br />really a land-use issue. The licensing requirement remains essentially the same; the primary <br />change is to simply drop the CUP requirement from the process. Other changes include <br />adding language to define persons ineligible for a kennel license and establishing criteria and <br />a mechanism through which a license may be revoked for just cause. <br /> <br />By adopting these changes, residents would still need to present a petition bearing the <br />signatures of at least 50% of their neighbors within 500 feet if they would like to have three or <br />four dogs, however they would no longer be required to wait six weeks to go through the <br />Conditional Use Permit and public hearing process. <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Commission Action: <br /> <br />At their meeting on July 5, 2006, the Planning Commission approved Resolution 842-06 <br />which recommends approval of the attached Ordinance 774. The Planning Commission <br />recommended that the “persons ineligible” section be strengthened so that people cited or <br />charged with animal cruelty offenses would not be granted a license. The prosecuting <br />attorney reviewed the ordinance and drafted the “persons ineligible” language. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.