Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June 26, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 26 <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/FLAHERTY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6866 1 <br />Including Various Items in the Feasibility Report for the Street and Utility Improvement Program 2 <br />/ Public Informational Meeting Update as amended. 3 <br /> 4 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 5 <br /> 6 <br />I. Resolution 6853 Authorizing the Contract for Architectural Services for the 7 <br />Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Mounds View Community 8 <br />Center 9 <br /> 10 <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that on June 5, 2006, the City Council at a work session 11 <br />reviewed the proposed improvements to the Mounds View Community Center, which included 12 <br />concept and development level plans. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Administrator Ulrich stated that the Mounds View Community Center Task Force presented the 15 <br />initial report to the City Council on March 6, 2006 and based on that report, the Council acted to 16 <br />hire DSGW Architects, Inc., to conduct a study of the task force recommendations. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Administrator Ulrich explained that the architect worked with City to refine the concepts, to 19 <br />make additional recommendations, and to develop a cost estimate for the proposed improvement, 20 <br />estimated at $600,000. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Administrator Ulrich added that there are several funding sources; including Special Projects 23 <br />Fund, Park Dedication Fund, Internal loans with general tax levy, Internal loans repaid with 24 <br />increased room rentals and membership fees and Capital bonds. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Administrator Ulrich stated market feasibility was discussed briefly, and ultimately the first 27 <br />source would be funding the proposed improvements with internal loans paid back through 28 <br />rentals and fees generated by the facility. He said that it was the anticipation of the Community 29 <br />Center Task Force that memberships revenues could be increase with several different 30 <br />membership opportunities. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Financial Director Beer had included spreadsheets with different levels of memberships and what 33 <br />revenues those would bring in. He said the break-even point is about 400 memberships of each 34 <br />type for a total of 1200 memberships. He said that if no memberships were sold, the City would 35 <br />run a deficit of $190,000. He stated with the status quo, the City contributes $47,000 annually to 36 <br />the Community Center operation in addition to the budget for $142,000. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Administrator Ulrich said it is strongly recommended the City contract for the preparation of a 39 <br />market feasibility study. He stated that the firm Maxfield Research, Inc. would charge $7,000 for 40 <br />such service. He also suggested doing a survey of residents, which was not included in $7,000 41 <br />quote. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Administrator Ulrich stated received a quote from Anderson Niebuhr and Associates, which has 44 <br />done work for various locations who recommend the City survey sample of 400 residents, which 45