My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/08/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/08/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:45 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 5:26:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/28/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/28/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 24, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 22 <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: MARTY/GUNN. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6890 1 <br />Approving Change Order No. 2 for the Random Park Building Replacement Project. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he does not agree with the expense. 4 <br /> 5 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 6 <br /> 7 <br />L. Resolution 6874 Approving a Letter Agreement with the firm of Bonestroo, 8 <br />Rosene, Anderlik, and Associates to Assist the City with a Traffic Study of 9 <br />the Northwest Area of the City. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Director Lee reported this issue was brought up at July 10th and at that time the estimated cost 12 <br />was $43,420, which was not approved. Director Lee presented the Council with a revised 13 <br />proposal with a reduced cost estimate of $28,850. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Director Lee explained the changes. He suggested reducing project meetings from four to two 16 <br />under Task One, and to reduce Bonestroo personnel from three to two. He explained that under 17 <br />Task Three, it has been suggested to delete the orientation and destination study for Groveland 18 <br />and Eastwood Drive. He suggested the City reduce number of site visits, reduce alternates from 19 <br />six to three, and for Task 10 and 11, reduce the number of meetings. He stated the Council could 20 <br />hold a work session/neighborhood meeting, and have Staff vs. Consultants present the final 21 <br />report. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Councilmember Flaherty returned at 10:05 p.m. 24 <br /> 25 <br />David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road, asked who requested the traffic study. He stated traffic has 26 <br />not changed too much and suggested the traffic study be done when Medtronic is finished. He 27 <br />stated he does not understand why it would be done now and believes it should be done when 28 <br />Medtronic is finished. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Mayor Marty stated the study is more involved. He stated that he would rather run traffic 31 <br />counters across the streets and then determine traffic after Medtronic is finished. Mr. Jahnke 32 <br />agreed. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Councilmember Gunn stated that residents requested the traffic count. She asked if the purpose 35 <br />of the study is to determine what is going on regarding traffic in the City, and asked what the City 36 <br />will do with the numbers once they get them. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Director Lee addressed the Medtronic question and stated there was a traffic study done as part of 39 <br />the Medtronic development. He stated that those projected numbers would be incorporated into 40 <br />the proposed traffic study. He stated that waiting would cost more money to do changes to 41 <br />certain areas so that the roads are done before Medtronic is in. He stated the study would 42 <br />determine what needed to be done as far as Medtronic is concerned. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Mayor Marty stated that if there are large projected numbers, the firm would identify streets 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.