My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-28-2006 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
08-28-2006 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:45 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 5:26:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/28/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/28/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL 1 <br />CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 2 <br />RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA 3 <br /> 4 <br />Regular Meeting 5 <br />July 24, 2006 6 <br />Mounds View City Hall 7 <br />2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 8 <br />7:00 P.M. 9 <br /> 10 <br /> 11 <br />1. MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER 12 <br /> 13 <br />2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 14 <br /> 15 <br />3. ROLL CALL: Mayor Marty, Councilmember Stigney, Councilmember Gunn, 16 <br />Councilmember Flaherty, and Councilmember Thomas 17 <br /> 18 <br /> NOT PRESENT: None. 19 <br /> 20 <br />4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 21 <br /> 22 <br /> A. Monday, July 24, 2006 City Council Agenda 23 <br /> 24 <br />MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/THOMAS. To Approve the Monday, July 24, 2006 agenda 25 <br />as presented. 26 <br /> 27 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 28 <br /> 29 <br />5. PUBLIC INPUT 30 <br /> 31 <br />Ken Glidden, 5240 Edgewood Drive, stated his question regards the agenda and the order of 32 <br />Items D and E. He stated that Item D deals with a variance denial and Item E deals with the IUP 33 <br />and asked why they were in that order. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Community Development Director Ericson suggested Items D and E be switched. 36 <br />Councilmember Thomas pointed out that one of the items was a public hearing, and one was not. 37 <br /> 38 <br />David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road, stated his concerns regarding the proposed fitness center. 39 <br />He said he does not understand why the City is willing to spend $500,000 on a fitness center 40 <br />when there are several private fitness centers in the City. He stated the proposed fitness center 41 <br />would not mean the building is being given back to the residents. He stated the Council should 42 <br />consider it closely before approval. He stated he has not spoken to one other resident who is in 43 <br />favor of the fitness center and believes that it will be a failing business. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.