Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council July 24, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked about the spike in 1999 with the operation expenses related to the 1 <br />water fund on page 10. Mayor Marty stated he does not recall why there was the spike. 2 <br />Councilmember Flaherty pointed out it went from $700K to nearly $1 million. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Director Lee stated it was a water-meter change-out program. 5 <br /> 6 <br />MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/STIGNEY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6868 7 <br />Accepting the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended December 31, 2005. 8 <br /> 9 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 10 <br /> 11 <br />7. COUNCIL BUSINESS 12 <br /> 13 <br />A. 7:05 pm - Public Hearing to Consider the First Reading and Introduction of 14 <br />Ordinance 776, an Ordinance adopting the Five Year Financial Plan. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Finance Director Beer stated at the last work session the 5-year financial plan was presented for 17 <br />review and discussion. He recommended opening the public hearing. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 7:24 p.m. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Ken Glidden, 5240 Edgewood Drive, commented that it bothered him to hear that there is a shift 22 <br />of the revenue source toward property taxes as reported in the budget report. He stated that even 23 <br />if the shift is the same as what is happening in other Cities, the shift should concern residents. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Mayor Marty responded that it is due basically to the reduction and elimination of LGA, Local 26 <br />Government Assistance. He stated the City used to receive close to $1 a year in LGA and when 27 <br />that was cut there were the same expenses in the City. He stated in order to keep the City 28 <br />running, they had to raise taxes. He stated the state property taxes were cut, but the City had to 29 <br />raise taxes in order to keep the City running. He noted the shift from the State funding to City 30 <br />funding. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated the point in the report was a shift to property taxes from the City 33 <br />doing business. She stated the City has stopped doing business and that is the reason for the 34 <br />shift. She stated the major reason was the sale of the Golf Course. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Mr. Glidden stated the City has very few other sources of income. He asked if there will be 37 <br />increases or decreases to the assumptions about estimated market and assessed property value. 38 <br />Finance Director Beer stated assessed values are not considered, but that there is a 3% levy 39 <br />increase estimate. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Mr. Glidden asked about the overall increase in expenditures. Mayor Marty replied that the 42 <br />Council’s goal is to have a 0% increase. Finance Director Beer stated that for 2007, he 43 <br />calculated 0%, but for the subsequent years he factored 3%. 44 <br /> 45