Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 14, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Hearing no comments, Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. 4 <br /> 5 <br />MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/THOMAS. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6901 6 <br />Approving a Conditional Use Permit for an Oversize Garage at 2932 Woodale Drive. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Ayes - -- 5 Nays - -- 0 Motion carried. 9 <br /> 10 <br />B. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 773, an Ordinance Amending the 11 <br />Zoning Code Relating to Landscaping, Fences and Retaining Walls. (ROLL 12 <br />CALL VOTE) 13 <br /> 14 <br />Director Ericson explained that the ordinance is back for a second reading after the previous 15 <br />second reading on June 26th was tabled. He stated the Amundsens had additional language 16 <br />requests and that the Council tabled action and recommended the City Attorney and Planning 17 <br />Commission review suggested changes. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Director Ericson stated the changes were presented to the Planning Commission on August 2nd. 20 <br />He explained the Commission reviewed the changes individually and felt none of the suggested 21 <br />changes should be included in the ordinance and it should be approved as previously presented. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Director Ericson explained that the Planning Commission had previously discussed the language, 24 <br />but determined it does not make sense to incorporate the suggestions universally. He stated the 25 <br />changes could be considered over -legislated in some cases. He stated if the City has control over 26 <br />the land, that there will be railings and protections on retaining walls, but the Planning 27 <br />Commission felt it did not make sense to change the language universally. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Director Ericson stated Staff and the Planning Commission suggest approving the ordinance as it 30 <br />was originally presented. He stated Staff believes the code does sufficiently address some of the 31 <br />concerns brought up by the Amundsens. He added Staff is recommending the ordinance the way 32 <br />it was originally presented because they do not want to over -legislate. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Brian Amundsen, 3048 Wooddale Drive, stated that when the he brought his and his wife’s 37 <br />concerns to the Planning Commission and Council in the spring, he was told there was no 38 <br />ordinance to address his situation. He stated that the language his wife suggested would 39 <br />specifically address his concern. He stated the suggested wording regarding retaining walls next 40 <br />to pools would have allowed the Council or Planning Commission to deny any retaining wall that 41 <br />is along side a public safety structure. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Mr. Amundsen stated that he suggested additional language regarding public safety and asked the 44 <br />language be incorporated into item seven. He said he is more concerned about safety and 45