My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/09/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/09/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:10 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 5:30:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/25/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/25/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />come in to the building, but they all ask when the parking lot will be done. He stated that he 1 <br />could not lease the building until the parking is done. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Mr. Perrozzi stated that he worked with Velmeir with the piece of property and they need to take 4 <br />care of it. He also asked why he could not speak with the City’s engineers who worked on the 5 <br />project. He said he will pay for the engineers’ time for the meeting. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Mr. Perrozzi stated he is trying to mediate this situation and will begin litigation unless he can 8 <br />get it done. He asked if the City is powerless to do anything. He noted his concern that it is 9 <br />taking so long. He stated last fall he went to the watershed district, he told the property owners 10 <br />last fall what the district needed, and nothing was done. He stated that the watershed district has 11 <br />to submit a plan, the City would approve the plan, but Velmeir is not doing anything to approve 12 <br />it. He stated there are two months to get the parking lot done. He also explained all of the steps 13 <br />that have to be taken in order to approve the parking lot with the watershed district. He stated he 14 <br />has done everything he can, but Velmeir has not. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Mayor Marty noted that there are two pieces of private property, one owned by CVS, one owned 17 <br />by Mr. Perrozzi. He stated the City is unable to tell either property owner what to do. He stated 18 <br />that if he and the other property owner cannot make it work, they may have to go to court. He 19 <br />stated he has discussed the problem with Director Ericson and Mr. Perrozzi and stated the City 20 <br />does not have much leverage between two private property owners. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Mr. Perrozzi stated that the positioning of the streetlight ruins his property and he has asked the 23 <br />other property owner to move the light. He stated when he has hired an attorney and stood his 24 <br />ground, the other property owner has finally listened. He noted the other problems. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Mayor Marty stated that Mr. Perrozzi has exceeded his three minutes and asked Director Ericson 27 <br />to try and set up a meeting between Velmeir and Mr. Perrozzi to try and work something out. 28 <br />Director Ericson stated that Mr. Perrozzi’s engineers have spoken to the watershed district, but 29 <br />that the plan needs to be in place before it could be reviewed. He stated that there should be 30 <br />resolution this week. He stated he would contact the owner of Velmeir and the engineers to set 31 <br />up a meeting. Mayor Marty stated he would appreciate such a meeting. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Mr. Perrozzi stated he would pay the costs of the engineers. He stated he would like to know 34 <br />how the grades were approved and how the project was set up. He said he wants to get the 35 <br />parking lot done to bring in tenants. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Director Ericson stated he is not sure if the engineers would help the problem. Mr. Perrozzi 38 <br />stated it would help him determine the liability of the plan. He questioned why the City would 39 <br />approve the plan for the parking lot when it may not be viable. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Mayor Marty asked Director Ericson to look into the issue and report back to the City. Mr. 42 <br />Perrozzi stated he would like an answer and will contact the engineers himself. 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.