Agenda Packets - 2006/09/25 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 18 1 Planning Associate Heller explained that the property owner has an agreement with the applicant, 2 which will divide the property into three half-acre lots. She noted that the lots meet and exceed 3 the minimum lot sizes in the City and that the current home on the lot will be demolished. 4 5 Planning Associate Heller explained that there would be a large buffer area. She stated that the 6 final plat has not changed from the preliminary plat that was approved. She stated that all 7 easements have been dedicated. She noted that the development is consistent to the 8 comprehensive plan. She noted the local water management plan has been satisfied, park 9 dedication requirements would be met and all utilities are already accessible from the street. 10 11 Planning Associate Heller stated that other than a call at the beginning of the project, there have 12 been no objections to the project. She added that the Planning Commission and Council had 13 both unanimously approved the project in the preliminary stage. 14 15 MOTION/SECOND: STIGNEY/THOMAS. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6924 16 Approving the Final Plat for the Subdivision of 8360 Long Lake Road. 17 18 Councilmember Thomas noted that she was satisfied with the tree preservation on the site. 19 20 Mayor Marty agreed and noted that the sixth “now therefore be it resolved” on the resolution 21 gives him satisfaction that the City has covered all potential problems. 22 23 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 24 25 K. Resolution 6927 Approving Authorization to Purchase Cable Equipment. 26 27 Communications Coordinator Blackford stated that she added the tax to the total, which brings it 28 to $25,209. She stated she did look into a different television set, which dropped the price by 29 several hundred dollars. She stated that even though the screen size is the same, the television 30 itself is too big for the original site and if it was hung, it would cost an additional $200. She 31 noted that the standard television would be cheaper, but the added cost would be to meet code 32 and hang it. 33 34 Communications Coordinator Blackford addressed the question regarding the “glitch” between 35 the split-screens. She stated that the time base corrector is needed so there is no jump when 36 switching from one camera to the next. 37 38 Communications Coordinator Blackford stated some of the items are needed because the City is 39 borrowing some items from CTV that must be returned. She stated she did request a quote from 40 EDA Audio, but they will not bid because they could not complete the project. She stated she 41 still only has one installation bid price from Alpha Video. She suggested Alpha Video because 42 they have the cheapest equipment price and has all of the materials that are being requested. 43 44 Communications Coordinator Blackford stated the cost of the equipment, along with cables, 45