Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 13, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Director Ericson indicated that, if approved, from January 1, 2007 forward every document 2 <br />would be archived into the system for future use. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Council Member Flaherty said that it states that Roseville has made a significant expense in the 5 <br />software and Mounds View will pay maintenance fees and he would like to know what the 6 <br />maintenance fee would be. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Director Ericson indicated it would be approximately $700 to $800 annually and noted that the 9 <br />software cost was around $75,000 to Roseville so the cost for the City to take part is the 10 <br />hardware and scanning costs and creating an index for those documents. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Council Member Flaherty asked whether the personnel hours are included in the estimate. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Director Ericson indicated that Mounds View Staff will do the scanning from January 1 going 15 <br />forward and they will undertake the scanning of the documents prior to that. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Council Member Flaherty asked what microfilm looks like and asked whether it is necessary to 18 <br />switch from microfilm to digital media. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Director Ericson indicated that it is not critical but it may be necessary if the City wants all 21 <br />documentation to be searchable in the same location. He then said that it is possible that the 22 <br />second year costs could be less if the City decides to maintain the microfilm reader but it is 23 <br />already getting harder to read the existing microfilm. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Council Member Flaherty indicated the City needs to do this but he is looking at it for ways to 26 <br />save money. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Council Member Thomas agreed with going ahead with the two year implementation because 29 <br />that will assist with the goal of increasing communication with residents. She then said that she 30 <br />would like to suggest that Staff stay on top of technology moving forward to do handwritten 31 <br />notes and keep in mind whether the City needs to keep those types of things for the future. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Council Member Gunn said that she feels that everything should be done because it would be 34 <br />difficult if one piece you were looking for was on microfilm. She then asked if there is the 35 <br />ability for an adjoining City to share documents by email. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Director Ericson indicated that is possible. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Finance Director Beer indicated that the microfilm is the only copy of some documents and some 40 <br />of them are beginning to degrade so the sooner the City gets them converted the better. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Mayor Marty indicated that he has spent days going through boxes of information to locate files 43 <br />on specific topics. He then said that there is the possibility for people to take documents from 44 <br />the files but, if it is electronically preserved, it will always be available to Staff and residents. 45