My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-01-1991 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
04-01-1991 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:10 PM
Creation date
7/24/2018 5:48:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/1/1991
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/1/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br /> Memo To :Samantha Orduno, Clerk-Administrator <br /> From :Ric Minetor, City Engineer/Director of Public Works <br /> Date :March 27, 1991 ci46g0g ; t:- <br /> Subject :Can Crusher Purchase <br /> Attached is the invoiceof concern for the $100 can crusher. As <br /> you will notice the can crusher was $18.99. This model holds <br /> several cans to be crushed and is an extra heavy duty model . The <br /> other item on the invoice is listed as "OUTLET_MARKED #3731" . <br /> This is a hydraulic spool valve used on the front end loader. <br /> The cost of this valve is $79.99. <br /> As with all entries on the AP list for Council, only the first <br /> item on the invoice is listed and the totalamount of the <br /> invoice. Oftenan item such as a can crusher or a pencil order <br /> will be the first item but the total may be upwards of hundreds <br /> of dollars . It would seem providing the item name actually <br /> misinforms the Council when there multiple items on the invoice. <br /> Possibly the item description on the AP list should be the <br /> account name, i.e. equipment supplies or office supplies, etc. I <br /> am concerned that the current system may contribute toward a <br /> reduced level of trust between the Council and staff. <br /> While I an discussing APs, I would suggest that it may be more <br /> efficient to approve APs by motion. The current need to approve <br /> by resolution causes the resolution index to be cluttered with AP <br /> approvals . The motion could be structured to include date <br /> approved and vote record. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.