Laserfiche WebLink
Mo View City Council Page Five <br /> Regis ar Meeting February 11, 1991 <br /> Discussion again followed regarding easements purchased by the <br /> City and areas on private properties which are to be maintained-. - <br /> as a wetland. <br /> Bill Frits- inquired if this plan was subject to any changes once <br /> it is approved by Rice Creek Watershed District. <br /> Mayor Linke stated that the plan will always be under review. If <br /> a new plan comes along that better suits Mounds View the old plan <br /> can be revised. <br /> Discussion centered on the fact that throughout the plan <br /> reference is made to utility. Mr. Minetor explained that a <br /> utility, as a financing method, has not been decided upon and <br /> suggested that the way to make it clearer would be to remove all <br /> references to a utility. <br /> Mr. Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, questioned section 3 .2 . 9, <br /> which is a continuation of table 3 .5, and asked if there is a <br /> budget line item for this with supporting documentation. <br /> eke Lobermier, SEH, responded that some items were specifically <br /> budgeted but some were general items . <br /> Mr. McCarty asked if the Council or consultant anticipated at <br /> this time a reallocation to utility accounts of items previously <br /> supported by the tax levy? Would these items be supported by <br /> utility acitivity? <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer stated that the purpose - <br /> tonight was to approve the Plan and the specifics of a financing <br /> method would be explored in death at a late ' 1 - <br /> Mr. McCarty, questioned if it was the Council 's intent to use <br /> this Plan and utility charges to escape levy limits . <br /> Mayor Linke stated that new items would be paid for under the <br /> Plan, but existing items would be paid for under the Streets <br /> fund. <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer suggested the Plan be adopted <br /> with the contingency that all areas referencing utility, will be <br /> stricken from the Plan. <br /> Russell Pahl stated that he would like to see an itemized <br /> 4Iftement. He said that there had been nothing publicized that <br /> ted the dollar figures and suggested putting off adoption. <br />