My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1990/12/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
Agenda Packets - 1990/12/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:47 PM
Creation date
7/24/2018 6:43:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/26/1990
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
12/26/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Subdivision 3. Means. It is go beyond financial considerations <br /> furthermore the intent of the City and this language reflects a <br /> to effectuate the purposes of this suitably broad standard. <br /> ordinance through the following <br /> means: "functioning wetlands" <br /> A. Adopt a map designating Intent: To eliminate the need to <br /> cxi3ting functioning the demonstrate that a wetland <br /> wetlands protected by "functions" prior to allowing that <br /> this Ordinance. that arc wetlands inclusion on an inventory <br /> to be protected from map. <br /> alternation°. <br /> Justification: The fact that past <br /> B. Promotc community practices may have negatively <br /> awarcnc33 of thc value of impacted wetland function is <br /> water feature° in the acknowledged in the existing <br /> community. findings language of this <br /> Ordinance. Also included in the <br /> 6B. Promote community existing Ordinance is language <br /> education about the requiring the enhancement of <br /> importance, function, existing conditions of wetlands. <br /> limitations , and On the basis of this language we <br /> intcrrclatcdnc3o impact feel that the intent of this <br /> of urbanization upon the Ordinance was to protect wetlands <br /> 410 water resources feature° regardless of the current <br /> of the community, functional state. <br /> including thc impact of <br /> variou3 land U3C3 within "the existing condition" <br /> the community, thc <br /> inappropriate u3agc of Intent: To expand preservation and <br /> certain domc3tic enhancement of "existing <br /> fcrtilizcr3 and thc conditions" to preservation and <br /> implementation of proper enhancement of wetlands in general. <br /> cro3ion control <br /> practicca. Justification: Existing conditions <br /> at the time of adoption of this <br /> $C. To preserve and enhance Ordinance with respect to wetland <br /> the cxi3ting condition of function are unknown. Enhancement <br /> wetlands within the and preservation of existing <br /> community through condition are also too restrictive. <br /> implementation of The City should have an option to <br /> development regulations enhance or preserve future <br /> that will ensure the conditions. <br /> design and construction <br /> of adequate on-site storm "retention and detention" <br /> water, sedimentation and <br /> holding retention and Intent: To replace a non-technical <br /> 411, detention basins, flow term with a technical term which <br /> control devices, and <br /> 2362161/WZO.WP/PLS 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.