Laserfiche WebLink
• at the building consistent with other City Zoning <br /> setback line. Ordinances. <br /> 3. All buildings, other Background: Taken out of context, <br /> than accessory the proposed language could be <br /> buildings . a s viewed as either a weakening or <br /> defined in Chapter strengthening of existing wetland <br /> 40 of this Code, zoning district regulations. Taken <br /> shall be setback at in context, the proposed language <br /> least 100 feet from is a clarification of contradictory <br /> the wetland. language'. The Ordinance currently <br /> prohibits: the placement of any <br /> structure within both the wetland <br /> and the buffer zone if the <br /> structure is proposed for lands <br /> C. All structurca 3ha?l be which are to be subdivided (48.05 <br /> 3ctback at lca3t 100 fcct Subdivision 4 - page 10) ; allows <br /> from the wetland. the placement of accessory <br /> buildings within wetlands (48.05 <br /> 4. A l l accessory Subdivision 2 - page 10) ; and does <br /> buildings shall be not have setback provisions for <br /> setback not less development in lands which are not <br /> than the setback proposed to be subdivided (48.06 <br /> requirements set Subdivision 3 - page 15) . <br /> S <br /> forth in Chapter <br /> 40.05 Subdivision C Justification: Contradictory <br /> of this Code. language must be clarified. <br /> Selection of the proposed setback <br /> standards was based on current <br /> Council practice. <br /> NOTE 1. These regulations only <br /> apply to lands proposed to be <br /> subdivided. <br /> NOTE 2. There is no variance <br /> provi-s-ion from these requirements. <br /> • <br /> 2362161/WZO.WP/PLS 12 <br />