My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-17-1990 SPECIAL CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
12-17-1990 SPECIAL CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:46 PM
Creation date
7/24/2018 6:45:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/17/1990
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
12/17/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. i <br /> is <br /> 1 <br /> Mounds View City Council December 17, 1990 <br /> Special Meeting Page Three <br /> Tom Foster, 2516 Ridge Lane spoke with regard <br /> to Whiteoak Homeowner's Association petition that <br /> related to homeowner's yard work and allowed <br /> removal of refuse from lake. He asked that <br /> the Council look at their petition again. <br /> They want to do landscaping maintenance <br /> without a permit. it <br /> Acting Clerk-Administrator Minetor stated the <br /> committee did look at the petition and other <br /> items. No group should have carte blanche. <br /> To use fertilizers and weedkillers you must <br /> have a permit. <br /> Mr. Foster, 2516 Ridge Lane stated they need 1 <br /> a DNR permit to treat weeds, etc . He inquired <br /> as to why a City permit is needed. <br /> Acting Clerk-Administrator Minetor stated j <br /> different items were looked at for what was !! <br /> appropriate for permits . The DNR has been �I <br /> lax in some areas and that is the reason for <br /> • the City ordinance. <br /> Peter Sabee, Barr Engineering he understands <br /> it will be a burden to obtain a permit, but it <br /> is necessary. Page 14, Item B covers this . <br /> It is very specific rather than vague and its <br /> intent is important. <br /> City Attorney Richard Meyers stated that years <br /> ago the Council stated they would protect wetlands <br /> and that a 100 foot buffer zone would allow for <br /> mowing, weed control, etc. The DNR has not always <br /> been responsive in the past. <br /> Tom Foster, 2516 Ridge Lane inquired if the City <br /> has phosphate fertilizer ban? <br /> Acting Clerk-Administrator Minetor replied it did <br /> not. <br /> Peter Sabee, Barr Engineering discussed the pros <br /> and cons of phosphate fertilizer. <br /> Acting Clerk-Administrator Minetor stated the <br /> ordinance does not prohibit mowing in a buffer <br /> . zone. It prohibits mowing only in a wetland <br /> district. Maintenance is allowed in the buffer <br /> zone. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.