My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1990/10/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
Agenda Packets - 1990/10/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2025 1:19:53 PM
Creation date
7/24/2018 7:25:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/8/1990
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/8/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 . <br /> 66/2L, V110, <br /> 411 MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Mayor and City Council <br /> FROM: Planning Technician Harrington <br /> DATE: October 11, 1990 <br /> SUBJECT: HIGHWAY 10 MORATORIUM <br /> The City of Mounds View passed an interim ordinance <br /> establishing a moratorium on development in a designated <br /> district within the City which commenced on April 24, 1989. <br /> This moratorium was to last one year. The primary purpose of <br /> the interim ordinance was to allow the City sufficient time to <br /> complete its planning process and determine what changes, if <br /> any, needed to be made to the Comprehensive Plan. However, at <br /> the end of the one-year period, it was determined that an <br /> extension to the moratorium would be necessary. Therefore, <br /> the ordinance was extended six months, commencing April 24, <br /> 1990. This brings us to the present and the need to address <br /> the issue once again. The moratorium is scheduled to lapse in <br /> October 24, 1990. <br /> Acting Clerk-Administrator Minetor and I have been reviewing <br /> the City files in order to determine what action, if any, <br /> should be taken on the ordinance. Our review seems to <br /> indicate that a majority of the concern revolves around the <br /> former K-Gas gas station and the adjoining property to the <br /> immediate west (see attached City map, Exhibit 1) . With the <br /> information available, we have formulated three possible <br /> courses of action: <br /> 1. Reduce the moratorium district to only include the area <br /> immediately north of Highway 10 and west of Groveland <br /> Road (Exhibit 2) . <br /> 2 . Allow the ordinance to lapse. <br /> 3. Extend the ordinance 90 days . <br /> It should be pointed out that neither myself nor Mr. Minetor <br /> were involved in this matter from the beginning, and it is <br /> quite possible that certain relevant facts have been over- <br /> looked on our part. However, from our discussions and review <br /> of the situation, these are the alternatives which appear to <br /> exist. <br /> Staff is asking for Council's direction on this matter. <br /> • PAH/BAB <br /> Attachments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.